Turnover: When It Rains, It Pours

Silhouette of executive walking through a revolving door, symbolizing nonprofit leadership turnover and organizational transition challenges
Reading Time: 3 minutes

Nonprofits preach resilience, but most collapse the minute a CEO walks out. If your mission can’t survive a transition, was it ever real?

CEOs are turning over at rates experts have never seen before … and when nonprofits try to fill these roles, qualified people are hard to find.

Nonprofit transitions rarely happen in a vacuum. When a C-suite leader departs, there are often multiple open roles across the team. As The Chronicle notes, “When staff are spread too thin, it can be difficult to maintain programming and generate resources to support the organization’s mission.”

Will multiple transitions jeopardize a search process, or become an opportunity for a new leader to make their mark?

The answer: it depends. In these moments, boards and organizational leaders often prefer to focus on one search at a time. Organizations cannot put their mission on hold until seats are filled and a plan is in place. Senior-level searches take time. Should you prioritize hiring the CEO or CDO to lead the team? Or backfill easier-to-fill roles to ensure operational continuity?

Success is more likely with clarity around roles, a strong, data-driven plan, and realistic expectations for candidates. When working with clients in these situations, we ask a few key questions:

Are There Clear Roles and Metrics?

Defined job descriptions, responsibilities, and performance metrics are essential—especially for onboarding. If these are in place, entry- and mid-level hires can be successful, even without a CEO in place.

This is especially true for advancement teams. Positions like event managers, communications specialists, operations professionals, and advancement services staff may function well with established systems in place. Gift officers may also be added during transition periods, provided there are established donor portfolios and clear expectations. These roles also lend themselves to flexible solutions—interim, fractional, or contracted support.

Is There a Strategic or Development Plan in Place?

Often, nonprofit leaders step down at the close of a strategic plan or campaign. That leaves boards with two tasks: hiring a new leader and developing a new plan. Which comes first?

Both strategic and development plans provide the opportunity for an executive to make their mark. At its best, it is a roadmap—and a recruitment tool. When these plans include measurable outcomes and clear direction, they show candidates what success looks like while allowing room for innovation. Strong candidates are drawn to organizations with a vision, even if challenges lie ahead.

For advancement leadership in particular, a solid development plan can guide the search process and help attract candidates who are eager to build on current momentum.

What Are the Challenges—and How Will You Share Them?

Even with careful planning, challenges arise. That’s why Benefactor Group’s executive search team begins each engagement with a discovery process to align around the organization’s future and identify roadblocks that a new leader may face.

It’s natural to wonder whether sharing challenges might scare off top candidates. In our experience, it does the opposite. Strong candidates value transparency—and want to understand both the opportunities and obstacles.

Being upfront about issues like staff turnover, culture, or outdated systems can actually help shape your search. For instance, if retention has been a problem, you may prioritize candidates with proven success in managing and mentoring teams. If you’re entering a period of growth, you’ll want someone with vision and experience scaling impact.

Forecasting challenges early also helps set mutual expectations, increasing the likelihood of long-term retention.

Embracing the Opportunity

While some leadership transitions are carefully planned, many are not. Organizations often face multiple vacancies at once. And while that may feel overwhelming, with the right support, these challenges can be reframed as opportunities—for a new leader, for the board, for the staff, and for the communities you serve.

Thoughtful planning, a culture of clarity and transparency, and a commitment to mission continuity are key. Whether you’re managing a planned departure or responding to a surprise resignation, you don’t have to navigate it alone.

If you’d like to talk about interim leadership, how to provide a realistic preview to candidates, or how Benefactor Group can support your executive search, we’re here to help.

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.
  • Adam guides clients through critical change moments, including leadership transitions. A member of Benefactor Group’s talent management practice, Adam has a passion for building strong teams to increase organizational impact and drive growth.

    Adam also has expertise in strategic planning, operations, program evaluation, communications and fundraising, cultivated through 15 years of leadership experience in the nonprofit sector. Prior to joining Benefactor Group in 2022, Adam was Director of Operations and then Director of Development at Local Matters, a Columbus-based nonprofit focused on increasing food equity.

    As a volunteer, Adam has served on the boards of healthcare equity and educational organizations. He graduated from Middlebury College with a degree in sociology/anthropology and French.

    View all posts

Browse by Topic

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

We occasionally publish thoughtful perspectives from practitioners and researchers shaping the future of philanthropy.

Learn about contributing.

Related Posts

Cracked pink piggy bank with coins spilling out, symbolizing the fractured state of donor participation in American philanthropy

The Participation Crisis Isn’t About Money — It’s About Meaning

Philanthropy isn’t dying—it’s consolidating. Americans gave $592B last year, but participating households plummeted from 65% to 45%. The culprit isn’t donor apathy; it’s nonprofit incompetence. Fragmented systems, spreadsheet chaos, and burnout have severed the human connection that sustains giving. Dr. Sanjay Bindra’s GOSUMEC Foundation proves the fix: zero staff, $10K tech stack, 90% recurring donor retention. Stop chasing dopamine hits. Build oxytocin ecosystems. Belonging beats begging.

Read More »
A lemon beside a mirror reflecting a lemon half, symbolizing a mismatch between appearance and reality.

Digital Dissonance: When Your Website Contradicts Your Mission

Nonprofits often build websites that look impressive but feel hollow. In chasing “professional,” they erase their own voice, personality, and lived reality. The result is digital dissonance—a subtle but powerful mismatch between who an organization actually is and how it presents itself online. Visitors feel it instantly. They don’t complain. They just leave, unconvinced and unlikely to return.

Read More »
Stone stairway ascending through clouds toward bright sunlight

Mission-Driven Giving at Work: What Faith-Based Campaigns Can Teach the Philanthropy Sector

Faith-based fundraising offers powerful lessons for the broader philanthropy sector. By anchoring giving in mission, community, and shared values, these campaigns inspire deeper donor commitment. Their focus on storytelling, transparency, leadership participation, and consistent engagement creates a culture of generosity. As Millennials and Gen Z prioritize mission-driven giving, nonprofits that adopt these principles can strengthen donor relationships, increase participation, and build more resilient, purpose-driven communities.

Read More »
Calm workspace overlooking an autumn forest through a large window, symbolizing transparency, clarity, and strong nonprofit governance

How Zero-Staff Governance Built a $2M+ Endowment

Small nonprofits don’t need staff or scale to achieve big-institution results. The GOSUMEC Foundation USA built a $2M+ endowment with 95% donor retention and zero campaigns by combining identity-centered community design, disciplined governance, and radical transparency. Its ICCO™ model turns donors into co-owners, while the GIVE cycle converts gratitude and voice into recurring support. Governance—not overhead—became the infrastructure, proving trust is the ultimate operating system for small nonprofits.

Read More »
>