Some Truth About Online Will Planners

Empty gift box with red bow, symbolizing empty promises of online will planners
Reading Time: 4 minutes

Billions Promised. But What’s Really Delivered?

The Big Promise

Online will tools have become the shiny new toy of the fundraising world. You’ve seen the headlines: “Billions committed to charity!” Sounds impressive.

But those “billions committed to charity”? They’re not dollars in your bank account. They’re mostly intentions in wills — future gifts that may or may not ever reach your nonprofit. Billions promised, pennies delivered.

It’s the fundraising version of the emperor’s new clothes — grand until someone finally points out it’s nothing more than smoke and a checkbox.

[For a broader strategic analysis of why nonprofits underperform when relying on online will tools, see Strategic Planned Giving: Why Online Will Planners Fail Nonprofits.]

Donor Behavior

Let’s talk about how people actually make wills.

  • The average age Americans first create a will is about 42, and nationally in 2025 only about 24% of adults report having a will at all (¹, ²)
  • Will ownership rises with age, but among 55+, fewer than half have a will; it doesn’t jump above ~80% until age 72+ (¹)
  • Updates are infrequent: most recent updaters made changes within the last 6 months–5 years, commonly after asset changes (~30%) or family expansion (~23%) (²)

Implication: If a 28-year-old commits “1% to charity” through an online will, what are the odds you’ll see it soon? Unless circumstances change dramatically (an unfortunate car accident, etc.), you won’t realize a cent for decades — if ever.

Some Math

Let’s do the calculation that online will tool market hype does not share:

  • Say 1,000 people use your will planner (already extremely optimistic)
  • Maybe 10% committed something to charity
  • Of that 10%, perhaps 1% actually designate your nonprofit

That’s 1 donor out of 1,000.

Quick Fact Check

“72% of Americans die without a will” is technically true across all adults. But among those 70+ — the donors who drive nearly all charitable bequests — nearly 80% have wills.

If that donor leaves 1% of a $400,000 estate, you’re looking at $4,000 — maybe in 30 years. Discounted to today’s value? Lunch money — hardly the stuff to impress your CFO.

Meanwhile, some nonprofits — from small shops under $2M to giants under $50B — are paying tens of thousands annually for this so-called ‘innovation’ that dates back to LegalZoom’s early-2000s heyday.

For that same $40,000, you could send 80,000 pieces of direct mail. Real outreach to real prospects. But instead, you’re funding a checkbox on a website.

The Checkbox Illusion

An online will tool is built for volume. Thousands log in, click boxes, feel good about leaving “something” to charity.

Nonprofits announce: “200 commitments this quarter!”

But here’s the problem:

That’s like bragging you got 200 phone numbers at a bar — an impressive stack of digits, zero actual dates.

Your board doesn’t care how many people clicked a box. They care how many prospects you can actually engage, steward, and report on.

Tools Create Intentions. Campaigns Create Results.

A tool without a campaign is like handing someone a hammer and calling it a house. You can wave it around all day, but nobody’s moving in.

What actually works:

  • Multiple touchpoints (direct mail, surveys, microsites)
  • Regular reminders and cultivation
  • Clear reporting your board can understand
  • A strategy that frames legacy giving as an expectation, not an afterthought
  • And perhaps an old-fashioned phone call now and then

With a deliberate legacy campaign, online will tools can play a supporting role. Without it, they’re expensive furniture.

Campaigns Don’t Just Deliver Wills — They Create Relationships

A will tool only talks about wills.

But when you run a true legacy campaign, you’re opening the door to conversations. And conversations lead to multiple planned gift types beyond wills.

That’s the multiplier effect:

  • A will tool = an intention in a database
  • A campaign = a pipeline you can cultivate into diverse gifts

The Risk

Here’s the part nobody wants to admit: nonprofits adopt an online will planner, park it on their website, and call it “done.” If only fundraising were that easy.

They’re not just wasting tens of thousands a year. They’re losing millions in future gifts because they chose a widget over a strategy. Real prospects go uncultivated. Real conversations never happen. Real gifts go to organizations that actually work their programs.

The Reality

If your strategy is “put a will planner on the website and hope,” you’re not planning — you’re procrastinating with a premium price tag. That’s called hope marketing.

The only way online will planners become useful is when they’re embedded inside a deliberate, aggressive legacy program. One that:

  • Creates substantial numbers of prospects
  • Nurtures those prospects systematically
  • Produces reports that boards respect

Without that, you’re fooling yourself. At best, it is just a tool.

Shiny Objects

People love chasing shiny objects — but it’s wasted motion. It looks busy, feels clever, and burns money that could fund real outreach. It’s activity masquerading as progress.

Remember the pet rock? Brilliantly marketed, everyone wanted one, but at the end of the day it was still just a rock in a box. Online will planners are today’s pet rock — a clever story wrapped around an empty product. Nonprofits aren’t buying a strategy; they’re buying the illusion of one.

Planned giving, by contrast, has always been old-fashioned — and that’s why it works. It’s built on persistence, personal contact, and relationships that endure. Even today’s new generation responds to authenticity more than gimmicks.

Cartoon king wearing crown and robe, holding a scepter, shown in striped underwear—humorous ‘emperor has no clothes’ metaphor symbolizing exposed vanity, hollow authority, and false promises.

The Big Promise

It’s the fundraising version of the emperor’s new clothes — grand until someone finally points out it’s nothing more than smoke and a checkbox.

The Proven Approach

Invest in a campaign and start cultivating relationships.

A real legacy program makes the tool part of a system — folded into mail, reminders, microsites, personal memos/notecards, phone calls, and reporting. That’s when it stops being a gimmick and starts being useful. And yes, perhaps an old-fashioned phone call — technology from the 19th century, still outperforming most widgets.

In the end, the nonprofits that win aren’t the ones with the flashiest widgets. They’re the ones that show up, build trust, and stick with their donors. Planned giving isn’t glamorous, but it works — and it always will.

This isn’t opinion. It’s 30 years of data.

Build a campaign. Use tools to support it. Or keep funding checkboxes while your competition builds pipelines.

When tools sit inside a deliberate campaign — as our Legacy Planner does — they become what they were meant to be: useful.

Sources

¹ Retirement Living. (2025, May 2). What is the Average Age to Make a Will? https://www.retirementliving.com/best-wills-and-trusts/average-age-to-make-will

² Caring.com. (2025, March 31). 2025 Wills and Estate Planning Study. https://www.caring.com/caregivers/estate-planning/wills-survey

 

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Joe is President of Garecht Fundraising Associates and has over 25 years of experience in fundraising and nonprofit management. He has led a $20M+ organization as Executive Director, served as VP of Development for a major educational nonprofit, and directed development at a large social service agency. Joe has consulted with hundreds of organizations, authored several books, including How to Raise More Money for Any Non-Profit and The Non-Profit Fundraising Formula, and works with clients nationwide and internationally.

    View all posts

Related Posts

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

Do you have:

  • A bold idea or unique insight?
  • A story of success—or hard-won lessons from failure?
  • Expert advice your peers need to hear?

Join other forward-thinkers shaping the future of philanthropy. Share your perspective, elevate the conversation, and let your voice be heard.

Contribute your wisdom today.

Related Posts

A lemon beside a mirror reflecting a lemon half, symbolizing a mismatch between appearance and reality.

Digital Dissonance: When Your Website Contradicts Your Mission

Nonprofits often build websites that look impressive but feel hollow. In chasing “professional,” they erase their own voice, personality, and lived reality. The result is digital dissonance—a subtle but powerful mismatch between who an organization actually is and how it presents itself online. Visitors feel it instantly. They don’t complain. They just leave, unconvinced and unlikely to return.

Read More »
Stone stairway ascending through clouds toward bright sunlight

Mission-Driven Giving at Work: What Faith-Based Campaigns Can Teach the Philanthropy Sector

Faith-based fundraising offers powerful lessons for the broader philanthropy sector. By anchoring giving in mission, community, and shared values, these campaigns inspire deeper donor commitment. Their focus on storytelling, transparency, leadership participation, and consistent engagement creates a culture of generosity. As Millennials and Gen Z prioritize mission-driven giving, nonprofits that adopt these principles can strengthen donor relationships, increase participation, and build more resilient, purpose-driven communities.

Read More »
Calm workspace overlooking an autumn forest through a large window, symbolizing transparency, clarity, and strong nonprofit governance

How Zero-Staff Governance Built a $2M+ Endowment

Small nonprofits don’t need staff or scale to achieve big-institution results. The GOSUMEC Foundation USA built a $2M+ endowment with 95% donor retention and zero campaigns by combining identity-centered community design, disciplined governance, and radical transparency. Its ICCO™ model turns donors into co-owners, while the GIVE cycle converts gratitude and voice into recurring support. Governance—not overhead—became the infrastructure, proving trust is the ultimate operating system for small nonprofits.

Read More »
Close-up of a futuristic artificial intelligence hand glowing with red neural network lights, symbolizing AI power and digital transformation in the nonprofit sector

AI and Nonprofits: Poll Results

Nonprofits aren’t “exploring” AI—they’ve already outsourced half their workload to it, mostly without policies, guardrails, or governance. Our latest sector poll shows AI has crossed from experiment to infrastructure while leadership naps. Staff are using it to survive; organizations pretend it’s optional. This is the wake-up call: AI won’t level the field—it will widen it. The competent will soar, and the careless will get exposed.

Read More »
>