Money Allergy

Woman holding money with a mask trying to convey preventing allergy
Reading Time: 3 minutes

Many of us have a money allergy. The moment financial terms enter the room—capital gains, charitable remainder trust, estate strategy—eyes dart, chairs squeak, and the conversation retreats to “impact stories.”

Here’s the reality: wealthy donors don’t think in anecdotes. They think in dollars, assets, taxes, and leverage. Until you speak that language, you won’t unlock serious gifts. A story without math is fluff. A story with math is a check.

The Allergy to Money Language

We in fundraising are trained to avoid financial reality: “Don’t talk about money. Talk about mission.” That might work for bake sales. It fails when you want seven-figure commitments, endowments, and legacy gifts.

The very words many dodge are the ones donors use every day: asset allocation, capital gains, estate planning, income streams. If you can’t say them, you can’t play at the table where serious philanthropy happens.

The Comfort Culture Is Expensive

Nonprofits have built a culture of niceness. Conferences preach relationships-first. Boards prefer platitudes over performance. Staff are warned not to sound “too salesy.”

The cost:

  • Millions left on the table.
  • Donors ignored because nobody dared talk taxes.
  • “Friend-raising” in place of fundraising while the endowment shrivels.

Avoiding reality isn’t kindness. It’s malpractice.

Who Actually Writes the Big Checks

Transformational gifts rarely come from committee meetings. They come from entrepreneurs and business owners—people who have sweated payroll, fired friends to save a company, and stared at cashflow at 3 AM. They didn’t build fortunes by dodging money talk. They mastered it.

So when someone fluent in margins, leverage, and opportunity cost sits through a “making a difference” speech, don’t be surprised when the result is a $5,000 check instead of $500,000. You’re speaking kindergarten to a graduate in finance.

The Cultural Mismatch That Kills Major Gifts

Most fundraisers are consensus builders. Most wealth creators are decisive executors. One speaks process; the other speaks outcomes.

When a fundraiser says, “Let’s explore how you might consider potentially engaging,” the donor hears hesitation. When a fundraiser says, “We’ll build relationships over time,” the donor thinks: “Get to the point.”

There’s also a worldview gap. Research by economist Arthur Brooks found that people who favor government redistribution are less likely to give to private charity; they treat taxes as charity. Meanwhile, the biggest personal checks come from people who believe individuals—not government—solve problems, and they fund solutions accordingly. Nonprofits often train teams who think like the people who don’t give, then send them to raise money from the people who do. No wonder conversations stall.

The Donor Story Myth

“Donor stories matter most.” True—stories humanize giving, inspire, and connect. But a story divorced from financial reality is weak.

  • Weak story: “Mary gave because she cared about the mission.”
  • Strong story: “Mary donated appreciated stock, saved $50,000 in taxes, and funded cancer research.”

Serious donors naturally include the financial framework in their own stories: “We structured it as a charitable lead trust … The timing matched our liquidity event …” They aren’t being cold; they’re being precise about how wealth moves.

Why Donors Are Bored

Wealthy donors don’t fear money talk. They fear wasting time with amateurs who avoid it. Open with appreciated assets, income-gift options, or foundation strategy and the reaction isn’t “pushy”—it’s “finally, someone who gets it.”

Competence in their world—the financial world—is the credibility signal. Without it, you’re another cheerleader with an impact video. With it, you become a partner in serious philanthropy.

The Recognition Factor

Once you speak their language, the dynamic flips:

  • You stop trying to prove the cause matters; they start asking how to structure the gift optimally.
  • You stop begging for crumbs; they explore multi-year commitments and estate planning.

Wealthy donors want to give significant gifts. They’re looking for competent partners who can help them do it right. Competence requires fluency in their world—and their world runs on financial strategy. Every day you avoid these conversations is a day the money flows to organizations that don’t.

Be Ready When the Moment Comes

The mission moves the donor. But when a donor decides to act, you must be prepared to guide the “how.” That’s where competence counts:

  • Offer gift structures that maximize impact and tax efficiency.
  • Understand timing considerations tied to liquidity and cashflow.
  • Know which asset types best fit their goals.
  • Help align implementation with their estate planning.

It’s not about forcing money talk. It’s about being fluent when the donor is ready for it.

A Professional Close

Philanthropy’s money allergy is curable. Start by speaking the language your donors already use. The story still matters—but the math closes the gift.

  • Viken Mikaelian founded PlannedGiving.com in 1998 and has spent nearly three decades advising and training nonprofit professionals responsible for billions in charitable gifts. He has presented at over 500 fundraising conferences and is widely published on planned giving strategy. Viken is the founder of Philanthropy.org and publisher of GIVING Magazine.

    View all posts

Browse by Topic

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

We occasionally publish thoughtful perspectives from practitioners and researchers shaping the future of philanthropy.

Learn about contributing.

Related Posts

Young Indian student carrying notebooks and backpack on rural road

They Outscored 2 Million Students. Their Families Earn $1,100 a Year.

In 2025, 42 students earned medical scholarships through one of the toughest need-and-merit screens anywhere. Median family income: $1,102 a year. Median exam rank: top 0.25% of over two million test-takers. These are students who studied under kerosene lamps, commuted hours to reach coaching centers, and still outperformed nearly everyone. Without support, their families face impossible choices—sell land, take predatory loans, or watch talent go to waste. The scholarship doesn’t just help. It prevents harm before it happens.

Read More »
Open checkbook on desk with a pen next to it demonstrating hesitant donor

Generosity Hasn’t Vanished — Confidence Has

American philanthropy isn’t suffering from donor stinginess—it’s suffering from institutional betrayal. As universities lose billions in federal funding and private donations simultaneously decline, the pattern is clear: high-capacity donors haven’t stopped giving, they’ve stopped trusting. Nonprofits that traded mission for ideology, accountability for rhetoric, and partnership for entitlement are now doubly vulnerable. The path forward isn’t another initiative—it’s a return to basics: measurable outcomes, donor autonomy, and respect for the people whose generosity built these institutions.

Read More »
A lemon beside a mirror reflecting a lemon half, symbolizing a mismatch between appearance and reality.

Digital Dissonance: When Your Website Contradicts Your Mission

Nonprofits often build websites that look impressive but feel hollow. In chasing “professional,” they erase their own voice, personality, and lived reality. The result is digital dissonance—a subtle but powerful mismatch between who an organization actually is and how it presents itself online. Visitors feel it instantly. They don’t complain. They just leave, unconvinced and unlikely to return.

Read More »
>