How to Fight Back Government Cuts

A powerful bull in a business suit signing a document labeled ‘Budget Cuts,’ surrounded by stern-faced executives, symbolizing aggressive financial decisions and austerity measures.

Cuts hurt. Survivors don’t panic—they plan. Legacy giving turns crisis into resilience, building futures that no government budget line can erase.

Reading Time: 5 minutes

The Arts, Government, and a Wake-Up Call

When the Classical Theatre of Harlem (CTH) announced it was losing $60,000 in funding from the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), the backlash was swift. News outlets lamented the blow to cultural heritage. CTH’s artistic director Ty Jones said it best: “I do hope that people will come out in droves.” He’s not wrong—what they do is vital to New York City’s cultural ecosystem, and their free “Uptown Shakespeare in the Park” in Marcus Garvey Park is a beloved community staple.

But pause for a moment before rushing to the nearest soapbox.

Let’s strip the emotional varnish off this situation and look at it through the cold, clear lens of business logic—the kind rarely used in nonprofit discourse, yet sorely needed. The truth is, President Trump’s proposed cuts to the NEA (and similar actions toward PBS and NPR) weren’t simply acts of barbarism against the arts. To some, these were acts of political vandalism. But to others—including many in the business world—they looked like strategic moves from someone who views funding through the unforgiving eye of return on investment and accountability..

Not good. Not bad. Just… different.

Unforgiving eye of return on investment and accountability. Not good. Not bad. Just… different. Or... just business.

The Problem No One Wants to Admit

Let’s address the elephant pirouetting in the wings: complacency.

Many nonprofit leaders—off the record, of course—will admit it’s an epidemic. There’s a well-documented lack of innovation, a near-total absence of urgency, and very little internal reward for taking real risks. A government check has often substituted for grit.

How often do you see nonprofit professionals bounce from job to job, never staying long enough to own the results of their efforts? That’s not a talent retention crisis—it’s a culture of evasion.

Trump, like any businessman, recognized a sector with its hand out and no performance metrics in sight. And he acted accordingly. If your knee-jerk reaction is to scream “censorship” or “anti-intellectualism,” stop and read Why Grantmakers Are Getting Tougher With Nonprofits. It’s a not-so-gentle reminder that philanthropy is increasingly allergic to complacency—and rightfully so.

And let’s be brutally honest here: some people I know in the nonprofit sector would be devoured if they entered the for-profit world. Crushed. Paralyzed. Not because they aren’t smart, but because they’ve been marinated in an environment where accountability is optional, results are subjective, and “collaboration” is often a substitute for decision-making.

Many nonprofit leaders admit complacency is an epidemic in the sector.

We're Hard Working. Hard Working In Our Comfort Zone.

Yes, the cuts sting. And yes, groups like CTH are the baby being thrown out with the bathwater. But here’s the part no one wants to say out loud: if your organization can’t survive without a government grant, the real problem is your business model.

That said, many of the nonprofits we work with are anything but complacent. They’re committed, innovative, and relentlessly resilient—adapting, experimenting, and doing the hard work most people never see. But that’s exactly why the broader sector needs a cultural shake-up: because the complacency of a few continues to create vulnerability for the many.

Ty Jones of CTH gets it. He told CBS News, “We’re not going to panic, so we’ll strategize, we’ll mobilize and we will execute.” That’s exactly the mindset that separates survivors from casualties in today’s funding landscape.

Jones even went on to say: “If you believe that CTH is great for NYC, we hope that you’ll go to our website, maybe make a donation, maybe buy a t-shirt, and if you have access to deeper pools of funding, contact me directly.”

That’s not begging. That’s business development.

Jones is one of the few arts leaders responding with resilience instead of victimhood. He deserves support. The Classical Theatre of Harlem deserves to thrive. But more importantly, they deserve to evolve.

If your organization can’t survive without a government grant, the real problem is your business model.

PBS, NPR, and the Safety Net Delusion

Paula Kerger, President of PBS, also pushed back hard against Trump’s NEA and CPB cuts. And predictably, the public responded with righteous indignation—cue hashtags, fundraising drives, and statements about the soul of America.

What often gets overlooked is that PBS and NPR are not just any nonprofits. They were created through the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 as congressionally chartered entities—meant to provide education and journalism free from commercial or political influence. Cutting their federal funding isn’t just a budget line—it signals a shift in how we view public scrutiny and shared cultural responsibility. Still, despite their unique origins, both organizations have become highly proactive fundraisers, with only about 15% of their revenue coming from government sources. That kind of diversified funding is exactly the model more nonprofits should adopt.

Look, we can admit PBS leans left—calm voices, neutral backdrops, and all. They still have an ideological slant. But they also do deeply valuable work in journalism, history, and education that transcends partisanship. The point isn’t whether they lean left or right. The point is whether we expect our most trusted public institutions to rely solely on government lifelines, or whether we build them to last. But here’s a counter-question: if these institutions are truly central to American culture, why should their survival hinge on a single line item in a federal budget?

What we’re witnessing isn’t an artistic crisis. It’s a test. And it’s long overdue.

The Solution That Doesn’t Make Headlines

There’s a reason we’ve been saying this for years at PlannedGiving.com and now on Philanthropy.org: don’t panic, plan. In fact, our editorial team just released a piece titled No One Ever Made Money by Panicking, and the title speaks for itself.

The arts—like every nonprofit subsector—need to move from the brittle model of transactional giving to the durable model of legacy giving. Planned giving isn’t sexy. It doesn’t trend on Twitter. But it works. And it lasts.

Imagine if every arts organization in America had invested even a fraction of their time building an endowment fueled by bequests, charitable gift annuities, or donor-advised funds. Would the NEA cuts still feel like a guillotine? Or would they simply feel like a shift in weather—uncomfortable, but not life-threatening?

Planned giving isn’t sexy. It doesn’t trend on Twitter. But guess what? It works. And it lasts.

Planned Giving: Your Safety Net Is You

Here’s the harsh but liberating truth: your donors already love you enough to support you for life.

You just haven’t asked them to support you beyond it.

Planned giving does what government grants and annual appeals can’t: it builds a future. Quietly. Reliably. Without needing to beg or plead.

The problem isn’t that Trump defunded the arts. The problem is that many arts organizations were never financially independent to begin with. And now they’re experiencing what business owners call “cash flow panic.” It’s ugly—but survivable.

If this is not addressed now, complacency will only metastasize. The next time the funding rug gets pulled, there may be no stage left to stand on.

At PlannedGiving.com, we’ve helped over 5,000 nonprofits—including theaters, museums, and orchestras—build the kind of revenue that doesn’t flinch in the face of political change. It’s time the arts joined them.

If this is not addressed now, complacency will only metastasize. The next time the funding rug gets pulled, there may be no stage left to stand on.

What Now?

It’s very straightforward:

  • If you’re a donor: Don’t wait for Congress. Support the institutions you believe in. And ask how you can include them in your estate plans.
  • If you’re a board member: Stop approving budgets that rely on hope and grants. Demand endowment strategies.
  • If you’re a fundraiser: Learn how to talk about planned giving. If you don’t know how, start here. (You’re welcome.)

And if you’re part of an organization like CTH, don’t just survive this. Use it. Use it to build the kind of infrastructure that lasts beyond one presidency, one grant cycle, or one emergency appeal.

Or as we like to say around here, don’t panic—plan.

Because the arts shouldn’t have to beg. They should thrive!

Side note … Can you tell I am passionate about this? I am an artist myself.

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.

Related Posts

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

Do you have:

  • A bold idea or unique insight?
  • A story of success—or hard-won lessons from failure?
  • Expert advice your peers need to hear?

Join other forward-thinkers shaping the future of philanthropy. Share your perspective, elevate the conversation, and let your voice be heard.

Contribute your wisdom today.

Related Posts

Elephant precariously perched on a fragile tree branch, symbolizing unsustainable weight, instability, and the looming collapse of fragile systems

7 Pillars That Keep You Standing

Nonprofits rarely collapse from bad intentions. They collapse because the foundation is cracked. Seven pillars determine survival: strategy, packaging, focus, prospects, outreach, stewardship, and leverage. Miss one and you wobble. Miss two or three and you’re irrelevant. Passion won’t save you. Discipline will. Prosperity isn’t luck—it’s alignment. Ignore the pillars, and you’re building a mission on sand.

Read More »

The Seton Society: How We Built Real Relationships with Major Donors

At St. Vincent Hospital, the Seton Society transformed major donor relations by engaging members year-round, not just thanking them. Each quarter offered unique experiences: elegant dinners with personalized gifts and speakers, volunteer opportunities, educational sessions, and surprise family events. A rotating planning committee kept ideas fresh. Recognition plaques, recruitment efforts, and volunteer awards deepened involvement. Many donors later joined the Foundation Board, proving genuine relationships outlast any single gift.

Read More »

Six Building Blocks of a Strong Nonprofit Brand

First impressions shape how people judge both individuals and nonprofits. Just as social interactions can hinge on superficial questions like “What do you do?” or “Where do you live?”, donors often gauge an organization’s credibility by its branding, not its actual impact. A strong nonprofit brand—through name, logo, messaging, voice, typography, and color—signals capacity and potential, attracting trust, resources, and partnerships that fuel meaningful growth.

Read More »
Wall Street Journal Clipping: Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think

Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think — And Donors Are Catching On

In 2017, the Wall Street Journal warned: “Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think.” Eight years later, was it prophecy? Alumni giving is down. Public confidence has collapsed. Colleges are closing almost weekly. Donors now ask: Am I funding thinkers—or just diplomas? Real education, or expensive amenities? If students leave no better at reasoning than when they arrived, why should anyone keep writing checks? The warning was clear. The collapse was inevitable.

Read More »
>