Philanthropy Needs to Look Around, Not Just Up

An image of a man looking up just like Philanthropy Needs to Look Around, Not Just Up.
Reading Time: 3 minutes

The most powerful acts of philanthropy rarely involve press releases, celebrity names, or commas in the millions.

The most powerful acts of philanthropy rarely involve press releases, celebrity names, or commas in the millions.

“MacKenzie Scott has donated $133.5 million to educational nonprofit Communities in Schools … the billionaire philanthropist’s donation is the largest unsolicited gift in the program’s history.”

This 2022 statement, as reported by CNN and announced by Communities in Schools, was one of many multimillion-dollar gifts given to nonprofits across the country by MacKenzie Scott after her highly publicized split with Amazon’s founder, Jeff Bezos. It is also a statement that thousands of nonprofits could likely replicate. Since 2019, she has distributed over $19.25 billion to more than 2,450 nonprofits, according to her website, Yield Giving.

During this time, I, along with many other professors across the country, have taught undergraduate students about philanthropy. We’ve focused on what philanthropy means, how it works, and why it matters. We’ve had a front row seat to developing the next generation of philanthropic leaders.

Given the transformative and, frankly, massive impact Scott has made across the nonprofit sector, one of the biggest challenges I face is helping students recalibrate their expectations regarding philanthropic activity. When their first exposure to giving comes from Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, or MacKenzie Scott, it distorts their sense of scale. They believe philanthropy begins with millions or even billions of dollars.

When a high-net-worth donor launches a foundation or announces a seven, eight, or even nine-figure gift, it dominates the headlines. But that doesn’t mean it should dominate how we think about giving, especially at the local level.

MacKenzie Scott’s giving strategy, although nearly unfathomable in scale, provides a glimpse into how billionaire giving can translate to the more traditional local giver.

I do not want to demonize, or even minimize, the impact of the ultra-wealthy. Their philanthropy has cured diseases, reshaped education, and saved countless lives.

However, I want to call for making philanthropy accessible to everyone. We need to stop treating billionaire philanthropy like a playbook. We need to stop looking up and start looking around.

Community First, Not Celebrity

We need to shift the narrative. Philanthropy at the local level isn’t small; it’s targeted. It’s deeply personal. It’s powerful.

It is the teacher who provides school supplies out of his or her own paycheck. The neighborhood group that fundraises and advocates for an accessible playground. The local family that fosters and bottle-feeds kittens because the shelter is overcrowded.

These are stakeholders deeply invested in helping their communities flourish.

When we idolize the billionaire giver, we risk missing what really matters: proximity. The closer you are to the need, the more context you have. And context leads to a more thoughtful and more responsive type of giving.

Scale Doesn’t Equal Smarter

The philanthropic moves of the ultra-wealthy can be bold, but they aren’t automatically better or smarter. As much as billionaires are often born out of successful business ventures, success is rarely predictable or indicative of wise decision-making.

Guy Raz, host of the How I Built This podcast series, ends each interview by asking founders whether their success is due to luck or skill. The answers are certainly a mixed bag. This should be neither surprising nor concerning. Humans aren’t perfect. That is ok.

Wisdom is not exclusive territory of those in the highest positions of society. The wisdom of the mom trying to improve literacy in her community should be valued, uplifted, and prized.

Yes, the expansive resources of the ultra-wealthy philanthropists can help solve large-scale problems, but the generosity of the local philanthropist is the lifeblood of a thriving community.

Look Around

It’s time to stop asking what billionaires are doing with their money and start asking what our communities need and how we can support that. We don’t need a bystander view of philanthropy. We need an on-the-ground commitment that empowers local leaders to use their time, treasure, and talent effectively.

Billionaires can afford to be wrong. Local communities cannot.

So, let’s stop looking up for inspiration. Let’s look around. Because the future of philanthropy isn’t top-down, it is all around us.

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.
  • Dr. Gammenthaler is a Clinical Assistant Professor and director of the B.S. in Business Administration degree program at Mays Business School. Previously, he led the school’s efforts related to Societal Impact by managing the Certificate in Nonprofit and Social Innovation. His teaching and research focus on strategic philanthropy, nonprofit leadership, experiential learning, and critical thinking in undergraduate business education. He enjoys spending time with his wife, four kids, two poodles, and engaging with the local community through their family’s nonprofit, Borrow Box BCS. He previously served as board chair for The United Way of the Brazos Valley and as a board member for OnRamp. He has also advised Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central Texas and the Baylor Scott &White Central Texas Foundation.

    View all posts

Browse by Topic

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

We occasionally publish thoughtful perspectives from practitioners and researchers shaping the future of philanthropy.

Learn about contributing.

Related Posts

Cracked pink piggy bank with coins spilling out, symbolizing the fractured state of donor participation in American philanthropy

The Participation Crisis Isn’t About Money — It’s About Meaning

Philanthropy isn’t dying—it’s consolidating. Americans gave $592B last year, but participating households plummeted from 65% to 45%. The culprit isn’t donor apathy; it’s nonprofit incompetence. Fragmented systems, spreadsheet chaos, and burnout have severed the human connection that sustains giving. Dr. Sanjay Bindra’s GOSUMEC Foundation proves the fix: zero staff, $10K tech stack, 90% recurring donor retention. Stop chasing dopamine hits. Build oxytocin ecosystems. Belonging beats begging.

Read More »
A lemon beside a mirror reflecting a lemon half, symbolizing a mismatch between appearance and reality.

Digital Dissonance: When Your Website Contradicts Your Mission

Nonprofits often build websites that look impressive but feel hollow. In chasing “professional,” they erase their own voice, personality, and lived reality. The result is digital dissonance—a subtle but powerful mismatch between who an organization actually is and how it presents itself online. Visitors feel it instantly. They don’t complain. They just leave, unconvinced and unlikely to return.

Read More »
Stone stairway ascending through clouds toward bright sunlight

Mission-Driven Giving at Work: What Faith-Based Campaigns Can Teach the Philanthropy Sector

Faith-based fundraising offers powerful lessons for the broader philanthropy sector. By anchoring giving in mission, community, and shared values, these campaigns inspire deeper donor commitment. Their focus on storytelling, transparency, leadership participation, and consistent engagement creates a culture of generosity. As Millennials and Gen Z prioritize mission-driven giving, nonprofits that adopt these principles can strengthen donor relationships, increase participation, and build more resilient, purpose-driven communities.

Read More »
Calm workspace overlooking an autumn forest through a large window, symbolizing transparency, clarity, and strong nonprofit governance

How Zero-Staff Governance Built a $2M+ Endowment

Small nonprofits don’t need staff or scale to achieve big-institution results. The GOSUMEC Foundation USA built a $2M+ endowment with 95% donor retention and zero campaigns by combining identity-centered community design, disciplined governance, and radical transparency. Its ICCO™ model turns donors into co-owners, while the GIVE cycle converts gratitude and voice into recurring support. Governance—not overhead—became the infrastructure, proving trust is the ultimate operating system for small nonprofits.

Read More »
>