The Power of Relationships in Fundraising: Why ‘I’m With Them’ Matters

Sign that reads "it's all about relatioships."
Reading Time: 2 minutes

At PlannedGiving.com, we’ve always emphasized that fundraising is about relationships—not just transactions. Whether securing a major gift or a planned gift, the foundation of philanthropy is trust, partnership, and shared values.

Dr. Russell James, a renowned expert in fundraising psychology, explores this concept in The Primal Fundraiser, where he explains how our natural instincts shape donor behavior. His research highlights a key principle: when donors feel a strong connection, they are more likely to give—and give generously.

One of his most compelling insights is the power of “subjective similarity” and “reciprocal alliances” in donor engagement. This article explores these principles and how fundraisers can apply them to build deeper donor relationships.

The Relationship Foundation: Primal Fundraising – “I’m With Them”

Fundraising is about relationships. That statement is often repeated, but what does it really mean? It’s more than just friendly interactions or polite conversations. A strong fundraising relationship taps into a deeper, primal level of human psychology.

Subjective Similarity: “I’m Like Them!”

Research shows that people are more likely to help those they see as part of their group. This sense of similarity triggers a deep-seated psychological response—what Dr. James calls “subjective similarity.”

When donors believe, “I’m like them,” they feel a natural affinity and are more inclined to contribute. It’s why organizations that highlight shared values, background, or mission resonate so well with potential supporters.

Reciprocal Alliances: “I’m With Them!”

But similarity isn’t enough. The strongest fundraising relationships come from something even more powerful: reciprocal alliances.

This means a donor isn’t just like the organization—they are with the organization. They feel a sense of belonging and partnership. They see the organization’s mission as their own.

This shift from “I support this cause” to “I am part of this cause” is transformational. It moves donors from one-time gifts to long-term commitments, including major and planned gifts.

What Does This Mean for Fundraisers?

If fundraising is about relationships, our role is to strengthen those relationships in ways that make donors feel like true partners. Here are a few practical ways to achieve that:

     

      • Storytelling That Reinforces Identity

           

            • Share donor stories that reflect shared values.

            • Highlight how others “just like them” have made an impact.

        • Recognition as Partnership

             

              • Instead of just thanking donors, show them how they are part of the mission.

              • Consider using phrases like “Your leadership in giving makes you an essential part of our work.”

        Closing Thoughts: Strengthening Your Donor Relationships

        At its core, fundraising isn’t about asking for money—it’s about building relationships where donors feel like they belong. By creating that deep connection, you’re not just securing a gift—you’re inviting someone to be part of a mission for life.

        Want to learn more about how strong donor relationships drive major and planned gifts? Explore our resources at:

        • PlannedGiving.com – Tools, training, and expert guidance on planned giving.
        • MajorGifts.com – Strategies for cultivating major donors and securing transformational gifts.

        For deeper insights, subscribe to Giving Today and Tomorrow, our magazine focused on philanthropy’s future.

        • Dr. James is a professor at Texas Tech University specializing in charitable financial planning. A former college president and planned giving director, he has published extensively on philanthropy. His research is widely recognized, earning him induction into the Charitable Gift Planners' Hall of Fame.

          View all posts

        Browse by Topic

        Colored open hand illustration

        Seeking Visionary Voices

        We occasionally publish thoughtful perspectives from practitioners and researchers shaping the future of philanthropy.

        Learn about contributing.

        Related Posts

        Young Indian student carrying notebooks and backpack on rural road

        They Outscored 2 Million Students. Their Families Earn $1,100 a Year.

        In 2025, 42 students earned medical scholarships through one of the toughest need-and-merit screens anywhere. Median family income: $1,102 a year. Median exam rank: top 0.25% of over two million test-takers. These are students who studied under kerosene lamps, commuted hours to reach coaching centers, and still outperformed nearly everyone. Without support, their families face impossible choices—sell land, take predatory loans, or watch talent go to waste. The scholarship doesn’t just help. It prevents harm before it happens.

        Read More »
        Open checkbook on desk with a pen next to it demonstrating hesitant donor

        Generosity Hasn’t Vanished — Confidence Has

        American philanthropy isn’t suffering from donor stinginess—it’s suffering from institutional betrayal. As universities lose billions in federal funding and private donations simultaneously decline, the pattern is clear: high-capacity donors haven’t stopped giving, they’ve stopped trusting. Nonprofits that traded mission for ideology, accountability for rhetoric, and partnership for entitlement are now doubly vulnerable. The path forward isn’t another initiative—it’s a return to basics: measurable outcomes, donor autonomy, and respect for the people whose generosity built these institutions.

        Read More »
        A lemon beside a mirror reflecting a lemon half, symbolizing a mismatch between appearance and reality.

        Digital Dissonance: When Your Website Contradicts Your Mission

        Nonprofits often build websites that look impressive but feel hollow. In chasing “professional,” they erase their own voice, personality, and lived reality. The result is digital dissonance—a subtle but powerful mismatch between who an organization actually is and how it presents itself online. Visitors feel it instantly. They don’t complain. They just leave, unconvinced and unlikely to return.

        Read More »
        >