Say What? Stop Using These Words!

Illustration of fundraiser with "jargon nonprofit speak" confuses couple
Reading Time: 4 minutes

Nonprofit Jargon is a Sure Way to Drive Off Donors

One of biggest challenges to marketing nonprofit gifts lies in the language we, as an industry, use.

On one hand, there’s a tendency toward technical details and board (bored)-speak when describing gift vehicles. The typical fundraiser reasoning is, “We’re writing for an educated audience.”

On the other hand is the tendency to use jargon—the kind of industry language that only nonprofit insiders truly understand.

Not coincidentally, the reasoning behind both approaches is the same. And so is the result: an unengaged audience.

Nonprofit Jargon to Lose and Better Words to Use

Here are six examples of jargon to eliminate from your nonprofit’s vocabulary—along with far more effective language you can use instead.

“Now more than ever”

(Thanks to Debbie Eliason, senior director of Planned Gifts at WETA TV, WETA Classical and PBS NewsHour.)

This phrase is so overused it’s lost any power it once had. Instead, be genuine and direct:

“We need your gift today, because (our program is at risk of shutting down; we’ve struggling to keep the lights on; families can’t feed their children,” etc.).  

“Impact, Impactful”

(Thanks to Cathy R. Sheffield, chief advancement officer at Lena Pope.)

“Impact is an ugly word. … I hear the word ‘impact’ and think of a collision,” Cathy says.

I couldn’t agree more—I cringe every time I see it in an appeal.  While “impact” can be used as a noun or verb, and it can mean “to make an impression,” the first dictionary definition carries a negative connotation. From Merriam-Webster.Com:

1) a: an impinging or striking especially of one body against another

    b forceful contact or onset

In context, that could be, “The collision’s impact left a dent in the driver’s-side door.” Or “The impact of the tragedy was felt by the entire community.”

Unfortunately, this nonprofit jargon is deeply embedded in fundraising language. It has been misused for so long it’s probably too late to put the cat back in the bag. But the next time you write an appeal or a thank-you, consider properly using the noun “effect” instead:

“The effects of your donation will be felt for generations to come!”

Even better, be specific and state what the gift will do:

  • “Your generous endowment will fund scholarships for generations to come.”
  • “Your donation will help our animal shelter supply food and medicine for three senior dogs for six months.”
  • “Your gift will help us to provide two weekend meals to a hungry child for an entire school year.”

And please, absolutely avoid usingimpactful.” It’s a real word, but at best sounds disingenuous. Instead, use a more specific and descriptive adjective: generous, transformational, inspirational, life-changing … you get the idea.

“Over-the-transom gift”

 (Thanks to consultant Jeff Comfort, former vice president, Principal Gifts and Gift Planning, Oregon State)

This term for realized bequests that a nonprofit wasn’t aware of should make you cringe. “Over the transom” originally referred to unsolicited (and unwelcome!) manuscripts sent to publishers—the phrase implied that the manuscripts were thrown over the transom of a door, after business hours. “When I’ve heard this phrase, I ask if we should thank surviving loved ones for the lovely ‘over the transom’ gift,” Jeff says. “So disrespectful.”


Instead, just call it what it is: “A surprise gift.” “An unexpected bequest.” Or even, “A pleasant surprise!”

“Making a difference”

This is a lazy phrase. Of course you’re trying to make a difference. But donors want details—how are you making a difference? How will their donation be used?  

Once again, specificity wins the day:

“Your gift will help us find homes for rescued dogs and cats.” “You gift will help us to spread God’s word to future generations.” “Your donation will help us to build a new pediatrics wing.”

"Donor”

(Thanks to Nate Broeckert, executive director of Coal Creek Meals on Wheels)

Yup, I said it, I’ve been saying it for years, and Nate agrees. Donor-centric language is the key to engaging your supporters—and the word “donor” is about as impersonal as you can get. When you think of your nonprofit as a business, your donors are really your customers.  And just like any nonprofit, “We are doing everything in our power to have repeat customers; to have repeat donors,” Nate says. “So it’s really just thinking about the customer experience when it comes to donors … the biggest language shift has been referring to them not as donors but as partners”

When you shift to a word like “partner,” you are automatically  elevating that customer experience. You are making that donor feel like they belong; like they’re a crucial part of your organization. You’re showing them that they have a stake in your mission’s success.

Other words to consider:

  • Supporter
  • Patron
  • Ally
  • Angel
  • Friend

A writer’s toolbox is made up of words. And like a mechanic, choosing the right tool for the job is essential. You wouldn’t use a hammer when you need a wrench. Elevate your nonprofit’s appeals, donor stories, and communications by focusing on simple, inclusive language. It’s the most direct path to effective, engaging and donor-centric fundraising.

Do you have a nonprofit jargon pet peeve? A better word for “donor” or any of the other examples above? Drop me a line, or let me know in the comments.

EDITOR'S COMMENT

Let’s get one thing straight: donors are not cryptographers. Yet, nonprofits seem determined to test their decoding skills with jargon so dense it could double as an escape room puzzle. I have experienced this several times.

If you’re still telling supporters their “over-the-transom bequest” is “making an impact now more than ever,” congratulations—you’ve successfully made them question whether they just donated to a worthy cause or fell into a corporate buzzword abyss. Spoiler alert: they’re confused, and confused people don’t give.

Here’s a novel idea: say what you mean. If a gift is unexpected, call it that. If donations help “feed hungry children,” don’t obscure it with “supporting youth food security initiatives.” And for the love of clarity, drop “impactful.” It sounds like something a marketing intern invented to sound … well, impactful.

Fundraising is not a vocabulary contest. It’s about connecting with real people who care. So unless your mission is to bewilder donors into submission, lose the jargon. Trust me—your “supporters” (see what I did there?) will thank you.

Now go forth, be clear, and raise some real money.

(If you insist on keeping “impactful” in your lexicon, at least have the decency to donate a thesaurus.)

~ Viken Mikaelian

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.
  • Patrick is PlannedGiving.Com’s Senior Editor of Content, Communications, and Storytelling. He is also the Executive Editor of GIVING magazine, where he helps bring you powerful, inspirational, and educational stories from the nonprofit sector. An author, editor, and marketing communications professional with deep roots in journalism, Patrick works closely with nonprofits to craft compelling, mission-driven narratives that inform, inspire, and drive action. Learn more at Patrickfodonnell.com.

    View all posts

Related Posts

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

Do you have:

  • A bold idea or unique insight?
  • A story of success—or hard-won lessons from failure?
  • Expert advice your peers need to hear?

Join other forward-thinkers shaping the future of philanthropy. Share your perspective, elevate the conversation, and let your voice be heard.

Contribute your wisdom today.

Related Posts

Wall Street Journal Clipping: Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think

Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think — And Donors Are Catching On

In 2017, the Wall Street Journal warned: “Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think.” Eight years later, was it prophecy? Alumni giving is down. Public confidence has collapsed. Colleges are closing almost weekly. Donors now ask: Am I funding thinkers—or just diplomas? Real education, or expensive amenities? If students leave no better at reasoning than when they arrived, why should anyone keep writing checks? The warning was clear. The collapse was inevitable.

Read More »
Surreal desert landscape shaped like a human eye, symbolizing the illusion behind inflated legacy gift lists and the need for clearer vision

The $117 Million Mirage: Why Most Legacy Gift Lists Are Illusions

A nonprofit celebrated 1,270 bequest commitments worth $117 million. Reality check: filtering for actual prospects yielded 55 names. Calling those 55? They reached five people—none remembered making any commitment. The culprit: organizations spending $8,000-$20,000 annually on digital tools, expecting software to cultivate donor relationships. When results disappoint, staff move on, leaving nonprofits with the cleanup. The lesson: five genuine legacy phone calls will always outperform 1,270 fictional commitments. You can’t build relationships with shiny website objects.

Read More »
Depiction of Harvard University

Would You Donate to Harvard?

Harvard: citadel of brilliance or fortress of privilege? For decades, liberals slammed it as an elitist gatekeeper—legacy admissions, donor perks, and wealth dressed up as meritocracy. Now, conservatives aim to gut its funding, branding it a woke factory. Different flags, same battlefield. Reform or revenge—the motives have shifted, but Harvard remains rich, elite, and untouchable. The question isn’t whether it deserves criticism. It’s whether you’d bankroll an empire of inherited advantage… or gamble on the promise of change.

Read More »
>