New Law, Same Panic

Concerned fundraising professional reading tax reform updates, reflecting nonprofit sector’s uncertainty after the One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed.

Though technically a tax bill, OBBB is far more than that. It’s a sweeping reaffirmation of Trump’s economic agenda, locking in many of the provisions first introduced in 2017.

Reading Time: 3 minutes

The Charitable Sector Misses the Bigger Story

On July 4th, Congress passed—and the President signed into law—the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB). Though technically a tax bill, OBBB is far more than that. It’s a sweeping reaffirmation of Trump’s economic agenda, locking in many of the provisions first introduced in 2017.

Predictably, the charitable sector responded with unease—as it often does in the wake of tax reform.

PG Calc called it a dilution of charitable tax incentives. Others warned of increased after-tax giving costs and a decline in itemized deductions. Once again, the sky is falling.

But take a breath. Step back. And look at what actually changed.

What Really Changed—and What Didn’t

OBBB makes several tax reforms permanent. Some affect charitable giving directly. Others indirectly. Let’s separate signal from noise—and highlight what the sector is missing entirely.

Capping the Charitable Tax Benefit for Top Earners (37% → 35%)

Yes, the deduction rate for the highest income bracket drops from 37% to 35%. This applies to roughly 0.5% of taxpayers. Technically a downgrade. Practically? Not much. These donors still get a deduction. And they weren’t giving for tax savings to begin with—they were giving to make an impact.

Introducing a 0.5% AGI Floor on Deductions

Starting in 2026, only contributions above 0.5% of adjusted gross income (AGI) will be deductible. For a donor earning $100,000, that means the first $500 in gifts isn’t deductible.

This isn’t a penalty—it’s a redefinition. A minimum bar. A way of saying: if you want to benefit from tax incentives, do more than the bare minimum. That’s not a burden. It’s a nudge toward commitment.

Making the 60% AGI Deduction Limit Permanent

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) had temporarily increased the cash contribution limit from 50% to 60% of AGI. OBBB makes that permanent.

That’s a major win for high-capacity donors. Quietly, this locks in a huge incentive to give generously in cash—yet it’s barely mentioned by the critics.

Creating a Permanent Deduction for Non-Itemizers

For the first time in recent memory, non-itemizers can deduct up to $1,000 (or $2,000 for joint filers). That’s real money—and real recognition—for millions of middle-income households. And it puts charitable giving back in the conversation for donors who’ve long been excluded by the standard deduction.

Locking in the Higher Standard Deduction

The standard deduction—$30,000 for joint filers, $15,000 for singles—is now permanent. Yes, this reduces the number of itemizers. But that ship sailed in 2018. OBBB didn’t create this trend—it simply codified it. Smart nonprofits adjusted years ago.

Preserving the Estate Tax Exemption

Starting in 2026, individuals can pass $15 million tax-free, or $30 million for couples. Some in the sector had quietly hoped for a rollback, assuming that would push more assets into charitable bequests.

But let’s be honest: guilt and estate taxes have never been the real motivators behind legacy giving. Mission drives bequests—not math.

The Bigger Story: OBBB Averted a Meltdown

While much of the sector frets over deduction percentages, here’s the real headline:

Without OBBB, the tax code would have reverted to pre-2018 rules. That would have triggered:

  • A sharp increase in taxes for many,
  • Reduced donor confidence,
  • And widespread economic uncertainty.

Instead, OBBB:

  • Stabilized long-term tax expectations,
  • Reinforced giving infrastructure with permanent incentives,
  • And helped donors and advisors plan for the future with confidence.

Like all tax legislation, OBBB reflects compromises—from helping non-itemizers to protecting major donors. This mix of provisions shows the balanced approach that actual governance requires, which is precisely why the sector should stop treating it as a catastrophe. Yet too many are reacting to headlines rather than reading the actual law.

Why the Sector Is Missing the Point

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: many nonprofit voices are more concerned with optics than outcomes.

  • A 2% drop in top-tier deductions gets more airtime than a permanent increase in AGI limits.
  • A modest floor on giving is treated like a punishment rather than a call to step up.
  • Some even lament that the estate exemption didn’t shrink—as if fear and taxes are better motivators than vision and generosity.

This is not strategic thinking. It’s reflexive nostalgia for outdated incentives—and it distracts from what’s now possible.

The Smart Fundraiser’s Takeaway

Don’t let the headlines—or the hand-wringing—set your strategy. Instead:

  • Use the new law to engage donors, not scare them.
  • Celebrate the certainty OBBB provides—because donors and advisors crave stability.
  • Frame giving as a long-term, tax-savvy act of leadership, not a transactional tactic.
  • Stop mourning theoretical incentives, and start leveraging the ones now locked in.

Stop Reacting. Start Leading.

The OBBB isn’t perfect. But it’s permanent. And permanence is power.

It codified clarity in a chaotic sector. It protected key tools that could’ve vanished in partisan gridlock. And it created new onramps to generosity for donors at every level.

The nonprofit world’s job now is simple: Stop panicking. Start planning. And start telling the bigger story.

Because this wasn’t just a tax tweak. It was a structural shift.

And if we’re paying attention, it may have quietly preserved the environment that generosity depends on.

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.
  • Dr. Scott Janney leads a 29-person team that produces $200 million each year in current funding for The Salvation Army’s mission and capital needs. His team of 16 frontline fundraisers records $80 million in new planned gifts annually. He’s helped secure many gifts of over $1M, including record-breaking donations at Villanova, AtlantiCare, and St. Mary Medical Center. A longtime Strategic Consultant at PlannedGiving.com, he specializes in transformational and blended gifts. Scott holds a Doctorate from Temple, an M.Div. from Princeton, a Bachelor’s from Asbury, and is a sought-after national speaker and author.

    View all posts
  • Viken is the CEO and founder of PlannedGiving.comMajorGifts.com, and Philanthropy.Org. He is also the publisher of GIVING magazine. Over more than two decades, Viken has helped thousands of nonprofits develop powerful, practical, and scalable legacy giving and major giving programs. An authority on planned giving marketing, personal development, and time management, Viken is also a popular speaker. Book him for your next conference or team-building session. Learn how Viken got into planned giving. Connect on LinkedIn

    View all posts

Related Posts

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

Do you have:

  • A bold idea or unique insight?
  • A story of success—or hard-won lessons from failure?
  • Expert advice your peers need to hear?

Join other forward-thinkers shaping the future of philanthropy. Share your perspective, elevate the conversation, and let your voice be heard.

Contribute your wisdom today.

Related Posts

Surreal desert landscape shaped like a human eye, symbolizing the illusion behind inflated legacy gift lists and the need for clearer vision

The $117 Million Mirage: Why Most Legacy Gift Lists Are Illusions

A nonprofit celebrated 1,270 bequest commitments worth $117 million. Reality check: filtering for actual prospects yielded 55 names. Calling those 55? They reached five people—none remembered making any commitment. The culprit: organizations spending $8,000-$20,000 annually on digital tools, expecting software to cultivate donor relationships. When results disappoint, staff move on, leaving nonprofits with the cleanup. The lesson: five genuine legacy phone calls will always outperform 1,270 fictional commitments. You can’t build relationships with shiny website objects.

Read More »
Depiction of Harvard University

Would You Donate to Harvard?

Harvard: citadel of brilliance or fortress of privilege? For decades, liberals slammed it as an elitist gatekeeper—legacy admissions, donor perks, and wealth dressed up as meritocracy. Now, conservatives aim to gut its funding, branding it a woke factory. Different flags, same battlefield. Reform or revenge—the motives have shifted, but Harvard remains rich, elite, and untouchable. The question isn’t whether it deserves criticism. It’s whether you’d bankroll an empire of inherited advantage… or gamble on the promise of change.

Read More »
Nonprofit board members sitting in a conference room - watercolor rendering

Nonprofit Boards Should Include Young People

It’s time we stop thinking of young people as future leaders and start recognizing them as current ones. Boards are not clubs for years served but strategic bodies for stewarding the mission. Readiness isn’t about age—it’s about perspective, commitment, and passion. Including younger voices isn’t symbolic—it’s strategic. They bring energy, authenticity, and digital fluency. If your board makes decisions about youth, equity, or tech, their presence isn’t optional—it’s essential. Empower them, don’t just appoint them.

Read More »
Small boat charting rough waters and winning — symmetry with a small foundation that succeeded against all odds

Small and Mighty 

The GOSUMEC Foundation proves you don’t need to be a big nonprofit to achieve sizable results. Drs. Sanjay and Archana Bindra turned their 25th wedding anniversary into a $1 million endowment for medical scholarships in India. With zero staff, full transparency, and a focus on legacy giving, their grassroots nonprofit offers a replicable model for small organizations everywhere. Visit gosumec.org or scan the QR code in GIVING magazine to learn more about their work—and the groundbreaking GIVE Study.

Read More »
>