Million Dollars, Thank You Card

Ever wonder how some fundraisers get credited for million-dollar gifts promised with a cocktail napkin scribble, while others are forced to run a gantlet just to get acknowledged for landing a bequest? Or why some fundraisers simply get a pat on the back, while others get hailed as heroes? This article dives into the wild, wacky, and often inconsistent world of fundraiser recognition and compensation. From Ivy League endowments to “olive-stained” pledges, we’re unpacking how organizations credit planned gifts—and whether fundraisers should ever (gasp!) be paid on commission. It’s a mix of ethics, creativity, and eyebrow-raising anecdotes that might just make you question everything you thought you knew about philanthropy. Grab a coffee (or a cocktail napkin) and dive in.

How Do Organizations Really Count Gifts?

At Plannedgiving.com and Majorgifts.com our inbox is a mixed bag: some emails are as thrilling as checking a grocery list; others make us wonder if kindness is on backorder; and still others kick off marathon coffee-fueled debates that’d put world peace negotiations to shame. Then, every so often, we stumble on a real gem—an email so intriguing that we can’t help but dive in headfirst, no helmet and definitely no second thoughts.

Like this one:

“How do you measure a fundraiser’s success when it comes to planned gifts? A $10M check is easy—boom, it’s in the bank. But a $10M gift in a will? How do you count that? How do you reward the fundraiser? And what happens if it never shows up?”

These are fair questions, and they unravel the moment you tug on the loose thread. Planned gifts are essentially long-distance promises that might not materialize for decades. Some fade away entirely, never making it to the bank. Meanwhile, the fundraiser who made it happen is left wondering if they’ll ever get more than a polite “Good job” and a half-hearted handshake.

This curiosity cracked open a door onto the strange, shifting world of fundraiser crediting. Some organizations stick with strict, data-driven metrics, while others—believe it or not—credit a conversation scribbled on a cocktail napkin (we wish we were kidding). In a field supposedly defined by ethics and genuine human connection, how we measure “success” can get weird. Really weird.

The Tussle Between Ethics and Reality

In theory, fundraising is about people and relationships, not commissions or quotas. In reality? It’s about as transparent as a smudged window. Some organizations only reward fundraisers after gifts are fully realized—fair enough. Others cut corners, giving partial credit for vague promises or scaling credit based on the donor’s age (because, apparently, the older the donor, the closer to “the real deal”?).

Consistency? Let’s just say that in the nonprofit galaxy, each planet has its own gravity. Fundraisers doing the same work—building trust, nurturing relationships, guiding donors—might find their efforts valued wildly differently depending on who signs their paycheck.

The Planned Gift Puzzle

Planned gifts add another layer of complexity. A will might promise a multi-million dollar donation, but should the fundraiser count that right away? Some organizations say, “Sure, if the donor is over 75 and provides ironclad documentation.” Others treat a heartfelt promise on the back of a coffee-stained receipt like it’s money in the bank. And then there are those that refuse to acknowledge anything until the gift is actually realized, no matter how sincere the donor’s pledge might have been.

Picture a dedicated fundraiser who spends years nurturing a relationship: calling on birthdays, sending handwritten notes, visiting when times are tough. After all that human effort, if the gift isn’t instantaneous, the acknowledgment might be minimal. It’s a bit like finally finishing a marathon and hearing, “Good job, we’ll tell you your time… maybe in a decade or two.”

Different Worlds, Same Uncertainty

At well-established universities and big institutions, the rules are often strict and money talks loudly. If the funds aren’t physically there, it’s a no-go for credit. Smaller organizations or those under pressure to meet ambitious campaign goals can be more, let’s say, flexible. They might do figurative cartwheels for a promise scrawled on a napkin—because when you’re struggling to make ends meet, even the scent of future cash can feel comforting.

One hospital confided: “If our board chair scribbles a $1M pledge on the back of a dog-eared menu, we’ll celebrate like it’s New Year’s Eve. Some unknown prospect makes a similar promise? Eh, maybe we’ll file it under ‘Nice Thought’ and move on.”

Rethinking Rewards

Then there’s that awkward elephant in the room: Should we offer bonuses to fundraisers landing massive planned gifts? Suggesting anything that sounds like “commission” can ignite heated debate. But could a tiny, ethically acceptable incentive encourage these frontline relationship-builders, giving them more than just a pat on the back?

On the other hand, would rewarding big planned gifts overshadow the importance of smaller, more immediate contributions, or put undue pressure on donors and fundraisers alike? The nonprofit world is all about balance—finding that sweet spot between fair recognition and not accidentally turning generosity into a high-stakes hustle.

The Need for Clearer Guidelines

These strange, shifting norms highlight a bigger gap. Fundraisers are the connectors—the people who guide generous souls toward making the world a better place. They deserve clear, fair, and consistent standards for how their efforts are recognized. They deserve something more human than “Just wait a few decades and see.”

And if all else fails, maybe we really should embrace the cocktail napkin method. After all, nothing says “I value your future generosity” like awkwardly scrawled promises, a wink, and maybe a half-eaten olive for good measure.

In the end, let’s remember that behind every gift, every donor, and every fundraiser is a human being—someone who has invested trust, time, and heart into making the world a better place. They deserve standards that truly honor their contributions, not just a formal acknowledgment. They deserve genuine, heartfelt recognition. And yes, it should be more than just a “Thank You” card.

Perhaps You Could Have Chosen a Better Headline

We had a blast writing this article, but the hardest part? Picking a title. After some spirited debate here were all the contenders. What’s your favorite?

  • What’s in a Gift? The Wild, Wacky World of Crediting Fundraisers
  • The Fundraiser’s Dilemma: Who Gets the Credit and Who Gets the Pat on the Back?
  • From Cocktail Napkins to Millions: The Strange Art of Crediting Fundraisers
  • Show Me the Credit! The Curious World of Fundraiser Recognition
  • Pat on the Back or Paycheck? The Wild Ride of Fundraiser Rewards
  • Million-Dollar Gifts, Zero-Dollar Bonuses: Fundraising’s Great Mystery
  • Big Gifts, Tiny Bonuses: The Fundraiser’s Paradox
  • Million Dollar Gifts, Thank You Card Bonuses
  • Commissioned Donations

One Comment

  • This article perfectly captures the humor, frustration, and ethical challenges that come with crediting fundraisers for planned gifts. The anecdotes had me laughing (cocktail napkins and olives, really?), but the underlying message is clear: we need better standards and fairer recognition for fundraisers who work tirelessly to bridge donor intent with impactful giving. Maybe it’s time for the industry to get creative—not just in how gifts are counted, but in how we acknowledge the people making them happen. Cheers to the unsung heroes of philanthropy—and their next million-dollar napkin!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Author Profile

Viken is the CEO and founder of PlannedGiving.com and MajorGifts.com. He is also publisher of Giving Magazine (formerly Giving Tomorrow). Viken is available for speaking engagements on planned giving marketing, personal development and time management. Learn how Viken got into planned giving. Connect on LinkedIn.

Related Posts

Senior looking into the future to make an impact.

Smarter Giving: How Seniors Can Make an Impact and Save on Taxes

Did you know giving to charity can save you money on taxes while making a real difference? Surprisingly, fewer than 40% of wealthy retirees know about tools like Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs) and Donor-Advised Funds (DAFs) that help them give smarter. If you’re 70½ or older, QCDs let you donate directly from your IRA, lowering your taxable income and helping you meet Required Minimum Distributions to avoid penalties. DAFs, on the other hand, offer flexibility to donate now, decide later, and even grow your contributions tax-free. Learn how these strategies can work together to maximize your impact and align your giving with your goals.

Read More »
Thora, a Norwegian Elkhound

The Real Cost of Pet Ownership

Thirty years ago, I said goodbye to Thora, my loyal Norwegian Elkhound, as she gave me one last, loving lick—a silent goodbye that still lingers in my heart. Pets teach us unconditional love, but their time with us is far too short, leaving behind lessons in loyalty and the need to plan ahead. From my Yorkie Chloe’s antics to my sister’s legacy fund for UC Davis Veterinary School, I’ve seen how planning can turn love into lasting impact. Pets enrich our lives, but their care—and the inevitable heartbreak—require foresight. Let’s honor their love by preparing for both their joy and their loss.

Read More »
Estate Planning Blocks

Rethinking Estate and Charitable Planning: Insights Beyond the Ultra-Wealthy

Rather than fixating on the ultra-wealthy, whose financial maneuvers dominate headlines but offer limited societal impact, we should shift focus to wealthy retirees—a much larger, reachable group navigating real financial challenges. These individuals, who have diligently saved through 401(k)s and IRAs, face issues like managing Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) and effective estate planning. Tools such as Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs) and Donor-Advised Funds (DAFs) provide retirees with opportunities to reduce taxes, secure their legacies, and amplify their philanthropic impact. By engaging this demographic with proven strategies, fundraisers can foster meaningful giving that benefits both families and communities, driving scalable and lasting change.

Read More »
Community

The Power of Community in Primal Fundraising: I’m Not Just Giving, I’m Sharing!

Imagine this: You’re not just writing a check—you’re building something bigger. Giving feels like handing something away, distant and one-sided. But sharing? Sharing connects us. It makes us part of a community, part of a story, part of each other’s lives. This isn’t just about fundraising; it’s about belonging. In this piece, you’ll discover how asking people to share—not just give—can inspire deeper connections, lasting generosity, and a stronger sense of purpose.

Read More »