The Power of Relationships in Fundraising: Why ‘I’m With Them’ Matters

Sign that reads "it's all about relatioships."
Reading Time: 2 minutes

At PlannedGiving.com, we’ve always emphasized that fundraising is about relationships—not just transactions. Whether securing a major gift or a planned gift, the foundation of philanthropy is trust, partnership, and shared values.

Dr. Russell James, a renowned expert in fundraising psychology, explores this concept in The Primal Fundraiser, where he explains how our natural instincts shape donor behavior. His research highlights a key principle: when donors feel a strong connection, they are more likely to give—and give generously.

One of his most compelling insights is the power of “subjective similarity” and “reciprocal alliances” in donor engagement. This article explores these principles and how fundraisers can apply them to build deeper donor relationships.

The Relationship Foundation: Primal Fundraising – “I’m With Them”

Fundraising is about relationships. That statement is often repeated, but what does it really mean? It’s more than just friendly interactions or polite conversations. A strong fundraising relationship taps into a deeper, primal level of human psychology.

Subjective Similarity: “I’m Like Them!”

Research shows that people are more likely to help those they see as part of their group. This sense of similarity triggers a deep-seated psychological response—what Dr. James calls “subjective similarity.”

When donors believe, “I’m like them,” they feel a natural affinity and are more inclined to contribute. It’s why organizations that highlight shared values, background, or mission resonate so well with potential supporters.

Reciprocal Alliances: “I’m With Them!”

But similarity isn’t enough. The strongest fundraising relationships come from something even more powerful: reciprocal alliances.

This means a donor isn’t just like the organization—they are with the organization. They feel a sense of belonging and partnership. They see the organization’s mission as their own.

This shift from “I support this cause” to “I am part of this cause” is transformational. It moves donors from one-time gifts to long-term commitments, including major and planned gifts.

What Does This Mean for Fundraisers?

If fundraising is about relationships, our role is to strengthen those relationships in ways that make donors feel like true partners. Here are a few practical ways to achieve that:

     

      • Storytelling That Reinforces Identity

           

            • Share donor stories that reflect shared values.

            • Highlight how others “just like them” have made an impact.

        • Recognition as Partnership

             

              • Instead of just thanking donors, show them how they are part of the mission.

              • Consider using phrases like “Your leadership in giving makes you an essential part of our work.”

        Closing Thoughts: Strengthening Your Donor Relationships

        At its core, fundraising isn’t about asking for money—it’s about building relationships where donors feel like they belong. By creating that deep connection, you’re not just securing a gift—you’re inviting someone to be part of a mission for life.

        Want to learn more about how strong donor relationships drive major and planned gifts? Explore our resources at:

        • PlannedGiving.com – Tools, training, and expert guidance on planned giving.
        • MajorGifts.com – Strategies for cultivating major donors and securing transformational gifts.

        For deeper insights, subscribe to Giving Today and Tomorrow, our magazine focused on philanthropy’s future.

        We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.
        • Dr. James is a professor at Texas Tech University specializing in charitable financial planning. A former college president and planned giving director, he has published extensively on philanthropy. His research is widely recognized, earning him induction into the Charitable Gift Planners' Hall of Fame.

          View all posts

        Related Posts

        Colored open hand illustration

        Seeking Visionary Voices

        Do you have:

        • A bold idea or unique insight?
        • A story of success—or hard-won lessons from failure?
        • Expert advice your peers need to hear?

        Join other forward-thinkers shaping the future of philanthropy. Share your perspective, elevate the conversation, and let your voice be heard.

        Contribute your wisdom today.

        Related Posts

        Wall Street Journal Clipping: Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think

        Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think — And Donors Are Catching On

        In 2017, the Wall Street Journal warned: “Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think.” Eight years later, was it prophecy? Alumni giving is down. Public confidence has collapsed. Colleges are closing almost weekly. Donors now ask: Am I funding thinkers—or just diplomas? Real education, or expensive amenities? If students leave no better at reasoning than when they arrived, why should anyone keep writing checks? The warning was clear. The collapse was inevitable.

        Read More »
        Surreal desert landscape shaped like a human eye, symbolizing the illusion behind inflated legacy gift lists and the need for clearer vision

        The $117 Million Mirage: Why Most Legacy Gift Lists Are Illusions

        A nonprofit celebrated 1,270 bequest commitments worth $117 million. Reality check: filtering for actual prospects yielded 55 names. Calling those 55? They reached five people—none remembered making any commitment. The culprit: organizations spending $8,000-$20,000 annually on digital tools, expecting software to cultivate donor relationships. When results disappoint, staff move on, leaving nonprofits with the cleanup. The lesson: five genuine legacy phone calls will always outperform 1,270 fictional commitments. You can’t build relationships with shiny website objects.

        Read More »
        Depiction of Harvard University

        Would You Donate to Harvard?

        Harvard: citadel of brilliance or fortress of privilege? For decades, liberals slammed it as an elitist gatekeeper—legacy admissions, donor perks, and wealth dressed up as meritocracy. Now, conservatives aim to gut its funding, branding it a woke factory. Different flags, same battlefield. Reform or revenge—the motives have shifted, but Harvard remains rich, elite, and untouchable. The question isn’t whether it deserves criticism. It’s whether you’d bankroll an empire of inherited advantage… or gamble on the promise of change.

        Read More »
        >