Philanthropy Under Trump: What To Expect

A Pen and ink illustration of the White House, to illustrate a blog on the future of philanthropy under Trump.
Reading Time: 4 minutes

Predicting the future of philanthropy is a tricky business—and even more so when it comes to political shifts. Under the new Trump administration, the direction of philanthropy could change, although I do not think it will drastically. We can only take some guesses based on historical data and recent events.

The Good

A good predictor of charitable giving has been the stock market. It’s simple: When stocks do well, philanthropy follows. A second Trump term will likely drive stocks up and therefore charitable contributions will likely rise, too. Financial prosperity has always correlated with increased generosity among Americans, who tend to share more of their wealth when their portfolios “even look” promising. That is, before their portfolios even actually go up.

Another predictor is taxes. Trump has long supported tax reductions, which means people may have more disposable income. Historically, when people experience reduced tax burdens, their capacity (and willingness) to give increases. Even businesses are more likely to give raises, which then passes to philanthropy. The combination of stock market growth and a lower tax environment could lead to a boom in donations, particularly from high-income households.

In short, the financial landscape might become a positive factor for philanthropy like in the past, with increased donations to many nonprofits—especially those focused on health, community services, and the arts.

The Bad

On the flip side, there are some warning signs. J.D. Vance (Trump’s running mate) could have a negative effect on large-scale philanthropy, particularly for university endowments and larger, powerful foundations. Vance has been outspoken about his belief that many large philanthropic organizations—such as the Ford Foundation, Gates Foundation, and even university endowments—are harmful to American society. Of course, he has a habit of changing his tune (like any other politician) to suit the audience, so these are just guesses. Also, I don’t think philanthropy is high up on Vance’s agenda.

However, as cited in Forbes, Vance has criticized these organizations for promoting “left-leaning ideologies” and has proposed measures on taxation. He once stated that “the Ford Foundation, the Gates Foundation, the Harvard University endowment, these are fundamentally cancers on American society but they pretend to be charities so they benefit from preferential tax treatment.”

His rhetoric (and this rhetoric has been around for several decades, and shared by many on the left and right), if translated into policy, could make the environment more hostile for the larger nonprofits, particularly those in education.

In fact, we are already seeing some impact on charitable giving to higher eds. According to Forbes, donations to institutions like Harvard have dropped by as much as 15% in recent months. A more adversarial political climate could further discourage some donors from supporting institutions that face negative public scrutiny of any kind or potential tax penalties. It remains to be seen how this aspect of philanthropy under Trump will play out. 

Moreover, the potential for new legislation targeting university endowments or even foundation assets could have profound effects. The College Endowment Accountability Act proposed by Vance in 2023 aimed to significantly raise taxes on endowment incomes, though it was blocked by Senate Democrats. However, if Trump and Vance gain more power, similar legislation could gain traction, posing a challenge to the financial stability of large educational and philanthropic institutions.

Even large faith-based endowments will be on watch, like the Mormon Church, which has an endowment almost twice the size of Harvard’s. But remember: Almost all government legislation involves negotiation, so these impacts will not be as large or “detrimental” as the media may portray. In short, don’t worry too, much regardless of which side of the aisle you are on.

The Toss-Up (The Tough to Predict)

Of course, there are always wild cards. The philanthropy landscape involves a web of economic conditions, policy decisions, and individual motivations. While it’s likely that the market and tax changes will create favorable conditions for giving, the question remains: How will donors react to increased scrutiny of foundations and university endowments?

The tone and content of public discourse can significantly impact charitable behavior. If Vance and his colleagues continue to promote some rhetoric towards some nonprofits, donors might think twice before making large contributions to targeted institutions. Alternatively, the pressure could push foundations and endowments to adopt more transparency and to focus more on core missions, potentially leading to increased credibility and renewed public trust.

Another unpredictable factor of philanthropy under Trump is how grassroots philanthropy and smaller nonprofits will fare. Historically, times of political upheaval often led to increases in grassroots efforts and localized charitable giving. People may divert their contributions from larger institutions to smaller organizations they feel are more aligned with their values or less likely to be affected by political pressures.

Final Thoughts

Philanthropy under Trump and his new administration is a mix of potential upsides and downsides. The likely positives are tied to market performance and tax reductions, both of which could create an environment that encourages giving. However, with J.D. Vance’s documented opinions toward major philanthropic players, we might also see a more restrictive regulatory environment for larger institutions—particularly those in education and progressive causes. Many claim, “It’s been done to businesses. Why not to nonprofits?”

Of course, we cannot fully predict how the landscape will evolve. The interplay of political power, economic conditions, and public sentiment will determine whether philanthropy in the coming years will flourish or face challenges. For donors, nonprofits, and those who benefit from charitable efforts, it will be important to stay adaptable and resilient in the face of change. But one thing is for sure: There’s never been a better time for planned giving.

My important take away? Don’t panic. That’s what the majority does. No one ever became wealthy by panicking.

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.

One Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Amida holds a Master’s in Taxation from Villanova University and is a prolific writer, specializing in philanthropy and its intersection with tax and giving strategies.

    View all posts

Related Posts

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

Do you have:

  • A bold idea or unique insight?
  • A story of success—or hard-won lessons from failure?
  • Expert advice your peers need to hear?

Join other forward-thinkers shaping the future of philanthropy. Share your perspective, elevate the conversation, and let your voice be heard.

Contribute your wisdom today.

Related Posts

Two radiant figures walk a giving path, symbolizing shared identity, community, and philanthropy inspired by example and legacy.

People Like Me Make Gifts Like This! (Social Norms in Primal Fundraising)

Primal Fundraising” explores how identity, social norms, and storytelling drive charitable giving. Drawing from behavioral science, myth, and experiments, it shows that donors are most influenced by examples of “people like me” making gifts. These identity-aligned examples activate a donor’s sense of belonging, challenge, and transformation—mirroring the universal hero’s journey. Whether through small gifts or major donations, social proof and shared identity compel action. The takeaway: storytelling and similarity are powerful tools to inspire meaningful, lasting philanthropy.

Read More »

You’re Ignoring the 10-Year-Old Who Will Fund Your Mission in 15 Years

Today’s 10-year-olds will inherit and create more wealth than any generation before them—yet we wait until age 40 to talk to them about philanthropy. That’s a strategic mistake. Habits form early, and if we want generosity to be part of their identity, we must start now. Philanthropy isn’t a transaction—it’s a belief system. Waiting means forfeiting influence over the values of those who will soon control trillions. The future of giving starts younger than you think.

Read More »
Blog Banner - GIVING Magazine Issues

GIVING Magazine Names Patrick O’Donnell as Executive Editor

We’re thrilled to share that Patrick O’Donnell will be taking the helm of GIVING magazine as executive editor, and will also serve as editorial director for GIVING’s sister site, Philanthropy.org. Patrick is a writer, editor and author who brings more than 30 years of experience to the table. He’s been working with the PlannedGiving.com brand for almost a decade, specializing in storytelling, attention-grabbing appeal letters, and planned giving content.

Read More »
Strategic nonprofit leadership needs to think five moves ahead like a chess grandmaster.

Your Next Five Moves [nonprofit leadership edition]

Inspired by Your Next Five Moves by Patrick Bet-David, this article reframes nonprofit leadership through bold, unapologetic strategy—not survival. It’s for leaders who want impact, not inertia. It separates those in denial from those ready to take action. And if you’re not a CEO? Read it anyway. You’ll understand how real leadership thinks—and become one faster. If you’re tired of playing checkers in a chess world, it’s time to think five moves ahead. Your mission deserves nothing less.

Read More »