Turnover: When It Rains, It Pours

Silhouette of executive walking through a revolving door, symbolizing nonprofit leadership turnover and organizational transition challenges

Nonprofits preach resilience, but most collapse the minute a CEO walks out. If your mission can’t survive a transition, was it ever real?

Reading Time: 3 minutes

CEOs are turning over at rates experts have never seen before… and when nonprofits try to fill these roles, qualified people are hard to find.

Chronicle of Philanthropy, February 26, 2024 Tweet

Nonprofit transitions rarely happen in a vacuum. When a C-suite leader departs, there are often multiple open roles across the team. As The Chronicle notes, “When staff are spread too thin, it can be difficult to maintain programming and generate resources to support the organization’s mission.”

Will multiple transitions jeopardize a search process, or become an opportunity for a new leader to make their mark?

The answer: it depends. In these moments, boards and organizational leaders often prefer to focus on one search at a time. Organizations cannot put their mission on hold until seats are filled and a plan is in place. Senior-level searches take time. Should you prioritize hiring the CEO or CDO to lead the team? Or backfill easier-to-fill roles to ensure operational continuity?

Success is more likely with clarity around roles, a strong, data-driven plan, and realistic expectations for candidates. When working with clients in these situations, we ask a few key questions:

Are There Clear Roles and Metrics?

Defined job descriptions, responsibilities, and performance metrics are essential—especially for onboarding. If these are in place, entry- and mid-level hires can be successful, even without a CEO in place.

This is especially true for advancement teams. Positions like event managers, communications specialists, operations professionals, and advancement services staff may function well with established systems in place. Gift officers may also be added during transition periods, provided there are established donor portfolios and clear expectations. These roles also lend themselves to flexible solutions—interim, fractional, or contracted support.

Is There a Strategic or Development Plan in Place?

Often, nonprofit leaders step down at the close of a strategic plan or campaign. That leaves boards with two tasks: hiring a new leader and developing a new plan. Which comes first?

Both strategic and development plans provide the opportunity for an executive to make their mark. At its best, it is a roadmap—and a recruitment tool. When these plans include measurable outcomes and clear direction, they show candidates what success looks like while allowing room for innovation. Strong candidates are drawn to organizations with a vision, even if challenges lie ahead.

For advancement leadership in particular, a solid development plan can guide the search process and help attract candidates who are eager to build on current momentum.

What Are the Challenges—and How Will You Share Them?

Even with careful planning, challenges arise. That’s why Benefactor Group’s executive search team begins each engagement with a discovery process to align around the organization’s future and identify roadblocks that a new leader may face.

It’s natural to wonder whether sharing challenges might scare off top candidates. In our experience, it does the opposite. Strong candidates value transparency—and want to understand both the opportunities and obstacles.

Being upfront about issues like staff turnover, culture, or outdated systems can actually help shape your search. For instance, if retention has been a problem, you may prioritize candidates with proven success in managing and mentoring teams. If you’re entering a period of growth, you’ll want someone with vision and experience scaling impact.

Forecasting challenges early also helps set mutual expectations, increasing the likelihood of long-term retention.

Embracing the Opportunity

While some leadership transitions are carefully planned, many are not. Organizations often face multiple vacancies at once. And while that may feel overwhelming, with the right support, these challenges can be reframed as opportunities—for a new leader, for the board, for the staff, and for the communities you serve.

Thoughtful planning, a culture of clarity and transparency, and a commitment to mission continuity are key. Whether you’re managing a planned departure or responding to a surprise resignation, you don’t have to navigate it alone.

If you’d like to talk about interim leadership, how to provide a realistic preview to candidates, or how Benefactor Group can support your executive search, we’re here to help.

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.
  • Adam guides clients through critical change moments, including leadership transitions. A member of Benefactor Group’s talent management practice, Adam has a passion for building strong teams to increase organizational impact and drive growth. Adam also has expertise in strategic planning, operations, program evaluation, communications and fundraising, cultivated through 15 years of leadership experience in the nonprofit sector. Prior to joining Benefactor Group in 2022, Adam was Director of Operations and then Director of Development at Local Matters, a Columbus-based nonprofit focused on increasing food equity. As a volunteer, Adam has served on the boards of healthcare equity and educational organizations. He graduated from Middlebury College with a degree in sociology/anthropology and French.

    View all posts

Related Posts

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

Do you have:

  • A bold idea or unique insight?
  • A story of success—or hard-won lessons from failure?
  • Expert advice your peers need to hear?

Join other forward-thinkers shaping the future of philanthropy. Share your perspective, elevate the conversation, and let your voice be heard.

Contribute your wisdom today.

Related Posts

Wall Street Journal Clipping: Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think

Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think — And Donors Are Catching On

In 2017, the Wall Street Journal warned: “Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think.” Eight years later, was it prophecy? Alumni giving is down. Public confidence has collapsed. Colleges are closing almost weekly. Donors now ask: Am I funding thinkers—or just diplomas? Real education, or expensive amenities? If students leave no better at reasoning than when they arrived, why should anyone keep writing checks? The warning was clear. The collapse was inevitable.

Read More »
Surreal desert landscape shaped like a human eye, symbolizing the illusion behind inflated legacy gift lists and the need for clearer vision

The $117 Million Mirage: Why Most Legacy Gift Lists Are Illusions

A nonprofit celebrated 1,270 bequest commitments worth $117 million. Reality check: filtering for actual prospects yielded 55 names. Calling those 55? They reached five people—none remembered making any commitment. The culprit: organizations spending $8,000-$20,000 annually on digital tools, expecting software to cultivate donor relationships. When results disappoint, staff move on, leaving nonprofits with the cleanup. The lesson: five genuine legacy phone calls will always outperform 1,270 fictional commitments. You can’t build relationships with shiny website objects.

Read More »
Depiction of Harvard University

Would You Donate to Harvard?

Harvard: citadel of brilliance or fortress of privilege? For decades, liberals slammed it as an elitist gatekeeper—legacy admissions, donor perks, and wealth dressed up as meritocracy. Now, conservatives aim to gut its funding, branding it a woke factory. Different flags, same battlefield. Reform or revenge—the motives have shifted, but Harvard remains rich, elite, and untouchable. The question isn’t whether it deserves criticism. It’s whether you’d bankroll an empire of inherited advantage… or gamble on the promise of change.

Read More »
>