The Telling and Troubling Way We Continue to Teach Fundraising

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Consider all the fundraising texts, blogs, articles, podcasts and conferences. Evaluate the content and note how often and carefully they parse and re-parse the process of fundraising, providing tips, tactics and tools for:

  • Identifying prospects
  • Acquiring donors
  • Engaging prospects
  • Making more compelling appeals
  • Soliciting prospects
  • Stewarding donors

Note how often the tone of these instructive materials treats fundraising as something we do to prospective givers, not what we do with potential partners.

Note how often the tone of these instructive materials treats fundraising as something we do to prospective givers, not what we do with potential partners. See how often they tout the latest technology with acknowledging that donor attrition has accelerated even as more and more sophisticated technology has become available to us.

In Pursuit of Metrics

Observe how frequently are we told what metrics will produce the best annual yields and how infrequently are we instructed on:

    • The ways to optimize the lifelong potential of each donor we are lucky enough to have

    • How rapid and impersonal transactional fundraising inevitably leads to higher rates of donor attrition and, therefore, long-term fundraising potential

    • How to listen for, respect and align our interests with donors’ most deeply held values

    • How to build not just “predictive profiles” but gather relevant donor information that will allow us to more gracefully manage long-term relationships even in the face of the constant turnover of fundraisers

    • The most effective ways of building and deepening donor loyalty

    • How building loyalty leads to higher levels of giving over time and the more regular receipt of significant estate gifts

    • How to pulse donors to ask how satisfied they are with their giving experience and what we can learn from other organizations that have, in their estimation, done a better job than us

    • How to create donor experiences that money can’t buy

    • How to turn donor talents into greater commitments of time and, eventually, treasure

In Pursuit of Credibility

Observe how rarely they underscore what organizations must obligate themselves to if they are to strengthen their fundraising credibility and appeal, including:

    • Conducting needs assessments to show how they are responding to changing societal needs

    • Being clear about where specific amounts of private support will lead to greater service delivery

    • Establishing performance metrics for mission delivery, not just fundraising

    • Making stewardship and accountability a shared institutional ethic

    • Developing policies, procedures and practices to ensure donor intent is preserved even long after the donor is gone

    • Treating donors like shareholders by giving them opportunities to voice their hopes and concerns and to be an integral part of organizational planning

Sustained Success

Note how infrequently they touch on, much less delve into, the predicates of sustained fundraising success including:

    • The architecture and process, including step-by-step strategies and tactics, for building communities of shared purpose that allow donors to believe, belong and make the world better

    • Appealing to the cause orientation of younger generations

    • Creating “big tent” coalitions in which diverse populations can find common cause

    • Creating constituents and developing partnerships in ways that are not unduly fundraising-forward

  • Creating civic collaborations and community-based coalitions that demonstrate how purpose-driven organizations are working together to address the root causes of social ills or steadily widen the circle of opportunity
Sign that reads "time for change."

Time for a Change

These predicates are what too many fundraising organizations are oblivious of or have taken for granted for too long, which has contributed to the decline in philanthropic participation, more rapid rates of donor attrition, and the steady decline in the effectiveness of fundraising-forward approaches. That, in turn, has led to the tendency of unaware bosses and board members to fault fundraisers and double down on traditional tactics, ignoring the laws of diminishing returns. As a consequence, fundraisers’ effectiveness is sorely sub-optimized, leaving them discouraged and looking elsewhere.

The predicates are what most fundraising organizations need to turn to with urgency and imagination if they are to stem the longstanding and apparently unrelenting trend of “donors up, dollars down,” the greater reliance on the wealthy, aged few, and avoid the inevitable, steady “dollars down” that will come as the wealthy few pass on.

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Jim is the President of Langley Innovations and a leading expert in philanthropy and higher education advancement. With over 30 years of experience, he has led transformative campaigns, authored five books, and advised over 130 institutions. Known for innovative strategies and donor-centric approaches, his work has raised billions and reshaped fundraising practices.

    View all posts

Related Posts

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

Do you have:

  • A bold idea or unique insight?
  • A story of success—or hard-won lessons from failure?
  • Expert advice your peers need to hear?

Join other forward-thinkers shaping the future of philanthropy. Share your perspective, elevate the conversation, and let your voice be heard.

Contribute your wisdom today.

Related Posts

Leadership Quiz Banner

QUIZ: Do You Know Enough to Lead?

Most fundraisers assume they deserve a seat at the table; this tool reveals if you truly do. It tests your grasp of financial metrics, donor intelligence, and strategic priorities—core knowledge that separates respected leaders from the overlooked. You’ll identify gaps in your organizational awareness and uncover the skills that position you as a trusted, data-savvy partner. It’s more than a professional check-in—it’s a reality check on your readiness to lead.

Read More »
Ethical dilemma illustration with angel and devil on shoulders representing tainted money decisions in philanthropy. It illustrates a blog post about taking controversial donations.

Take the Money. Save the Mission.

Who is our enemy? The current administration or us? This explosive essay argues nonprofits are committing suicide through moral performance theater. While organizations obsess over donor ‘purity tests’ and Twitter tantrums, missions collapse and staff get laid off. The brutal truth: accepting ‘tainted’ money isn’t unethical—letting your cause die because you’re afraid of headlines is. Universities and government take questionable money daily. Stop letting reputation managers kill your mission. Take the controversial donation, keep the lights on, and help people instead of virtue signaling your way to bankruptcy

Read More »
Two radiant figures walk a giving path, symbolizing shared identity, community, and philanthropy inspired by example and legacy.

People Like Me Make Gifts Like This! (Social Norms in Primal Fundraising)

Primal Fundraising” explores how identity, social norms, and storytelling drive charitable giving. Drawing from behavioral science, myth, and experiments, it shows that donors are most influenced by examples of “people like me” making gifts. These identity-aligned examples activate a donor’s sense of belonging, challenge, and transformation—mirroring the universal hero’s journey. Whether through small gifts or major donations, social proof and shared identity compel action. The takeaway: storytelling and similarity are powerful tools to inspire meaningful, lasting philanthropy.

Read More »

You’re Ignoring the 10-Year-Old Who Will Fund Your Mission in 15 Years

Today’s 10-year-olds will inherit and create more wealth than any generation before them—yet we wait until age 40 to talk to them about philanthropy. That’s a strategic mistake. Habits form early, and if we want generosity to be part of their identity, we must start now. Philanthropy isn’t a transaction—it’s a belief system. Waiting means forfeiting influence over the values of those who will soon control trillions. The future of giving starts younger than you think.

Read More »