The System Is Not Unfair

A single, frowning pawn stepping out of the crowd, to symbolize the perception that the system is unfair.
Reading Time: 2 minutes

What’s Fair for One May Not Be Fair for Another

Fairness is subjective. A 2021 study revealed that 70% of people earning under $50,000 a year felt the tax system was unfair, while only 30% of those earning above $100,000 shared the same view. What seems unfair to one person might appear entirely just to another.

Take taxation, for example. Many argue, “the rich should be taxed more,” but what defines being rich? Earning $100,000 a year? $1 million? Six years ago, while presenting to a local AFP (Association of Fundraising Professionals) chapter in Northeastern Pennsylvania, I asked, “What does the top 1% earn?” Responses ranged from $150,000 to $50 million a year. This wide gap highlights how financial literacy varies greatly. Without a clear understanding of income levels, judging wealth, fairness, or opportunity becomes challenging.

This knowledge gap is especially important for fundraisers, who operate directly in the financial realm. Accurate understanding is crucial for success in both personal and professional finance.

Knowledge is Power

Many elements of the system are neutral but require knowledge to leverage effectively. Financial literacy, legal awareness, and strategic networking often determine success more than systemic bias.

Consider the tax code. It can feel complex and punishing—but those who take the time to understand its intricacies often discover legal ways to minimize their tax burden. The system tends to reward those who learn its rules rather than those who dismiss it as unfair.

A simple question: Do you know how to read a basic profit and loss statement? Do you even know what that means? As a fundraiser, you’re in the “money business.” Mastering financial basics gives you a powerful advantage.

Take Personal Responsibility

The narrative of systemic unfairness often overlooks how life circumstances are highly individualized. Two people from similar backgrounds can experience vastly different outcomes based on their personal choices, effort, and knowledge.

One individual might access scholarships, mentorship, or career opportunities because they learned how to seek them out, while another might remain unaware of the same options. Does that make the system unfair—or does it reflect differing levels of understanding and action?

Empowerment Through Perspective

Viewing the system as inherently unfair can be disempowering, fostering a mindset of victimhood rather than agency and accountability. Shifting focus from external blame to personal strategy can lead to better decisions and outcomes. Education, discipline, and mentorship can significantly tilt the odds in one’s favor—even in difficult environments.

Acknowledging Real Issues

This isn’t to dismiss genuine systemic challenges like discrimination, unequal access to quality education, and economic disparities. These issues are real and demand attention. However, labeling the entire system as unfair oversimplifies the matter and diminishes the importance of personal responsibility in overcoming obstacles.

Master the System

The system is a complex web of rules, opportunities, and challenges. It cannot be universally labeled fair or unfair because fairness is shaped by personal perspective and experience. What matters most is how effectively you learn to navigate it.

Knowledge, persistence, and adaptability often prove far more powerful than debating abstract notions of fairness. The real challenge isn’t in questioning fairness but in empowering yourself and others to master the system on your own terms.

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.

Related Posts

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

Do you have:

  • A bold idea or unique insight?
  • A story of success—or hard-won lessons from failure?
  • Expert advice your peers need to hear?

Join other forward-thinkers shaping the future of philanthropy. Share your perspective, elevate the conversation, and let your voice be heard.

Contribute your wisdom today.

Related Posts

Neuro-Philanthropy: From Dopamine to Oxytocin

Philanthropy has mastered urgency — the dopamine-fueled rush of campaigns and instant action — but sustainable giving requires something deeper: relationship. Neuroscience shows that while dopamine sparks generosity, oxytocin sustains it by building trust, belonging, and identity. When nonprofits move beyond transactions and cultivate connection, donors shift from one-time givers to long-term partners — and ultimately to legacy supporters. The future of philanthropy lies not in louder appeals, but in nurturing relationships that endure and compound over time.

Read More »
Google-style search bars with the phrases “It’s All Here…” and “At Your Fingertips,” highlighting that information is easily accessible. Donor cultivation is critical. Fundraisers must understand money and how their donors think.

Ignorance Is Not a Fundraising Strategy

Do you know how wealthy donors think? Can you explain the gap between a millionaire and a billionaire? Have you checked LinkedIn before your last donor meeting? Do you track economic indicators shaping giving decisions? Most fundraisers can’t answer these questions—and that ignorance costs millions. Google is free. LinkedIn is free. Zillow is free. Donors don’t owe you their money. Show up prepared or leave empty-handed.

Read More »
A smiling child writes a thank-you letter. Thanking donors is important; adding an impact statement makes them feel like partners in your mission.

Mom Was Right!

Sometimes, I hear my mother’s voice in my head. As a child, I would receive a birthday card from my grandma every year with crisp five-dollar bills enclosed. My mother would sit me down with a pen and a fancy notecard to write grandma a thank you note. Her rules were that it had to start with “thank you” and then explain exactly how I spent the money.

Read More »
An image of sculptor of clay which is Doable, Durable, Desirable: Redesigning Nonprofit Leadership.

Doable, Durable, Desirable: Redesigning Nonprofit Leadership

A leadership crisis is hitting the nonprofit sector: veterans are retiring, and few want their jobs. Burnout, dysfunction, and weak succession planning have made top roles undesirable. The solution isn’t another search—it’s a redesign. Leadership must become doable, durable, and desirable: realistic workloads, real support, and roles people actually want. The future belongs to organizations bold enough to rebuild leadership itself.

Read More »
>