The System Is Not Unfair

A single, frowning pawn stepping out of the crowd, to symbolize the perception that the system is unfair.
Reading Time: 2 minutes

What’s Fair for One May Not Be Fair for Another

Fairness is subjective. A 2021 study revealed that 70% of people earning under $50,000 a year felt the tax system was unfair, while only 30% of those earning above $100,000 shared the same view. What seems unfair to one person might appear entirely just to another.

Take taxation, for example. Many argue, “the rich should be taxed more,” but what defines being rich? Earning $100,000 a year? $1 million? Six years ago, while presenting to a local AFP (Association of Fundraising Professionals) chapter in Northeastern Pennsylvania, I asked, “What does the top 1% earn?” Responses ranged from $150,000 to $50 million a year. This wide gap highlights how financial literacy varies greatly. Without a clear understanding of income levels, judging wealth, fairness, or opportunity becomes challenging.

This knowledge gap is especially important for fundraisers, who operate directly in the financial realm. Accurate understanding is crucial for success in both personal and professional finance.

Knowledge is Power

Many elements of the system are neutral but require knowledge to leverage effectively. Financial literacy, legal awareness, and strategic networking often determine success more than systemic bias.

Consider the tax code. It can feel complex and punishing—but those who take the time to understand its intricacies often discover legal ways to minimize their tax burden. The system tends to reward those who learn its rules rather than those who dismiss it as unfair.

A simple question: Do you know how to read a basic profit and loss statement? Do you even know what that means? As a fundraiser, you’re in the “money business.” Mastering financial basics gives you a powerful advantage.

Take Personal Responsibility

The narrative of systemic unfairness often overlooks how life circumstances are highly individualized. Two people from similar backgrounds can experience vastly different outcomes based on their personal choices, effort, and knowledge.

One individual might access scholarships, mentorship, or career opportunities because they learned how to seek them out, while another might remain unaware of the same options. Does that make the system unfair—or does it reflect differing levels of understanding and action?

Empowerment Through Perspective

Viewing the system as inherently unfair can be disempowering, fostering a mindset of victimhood rather than agency and accountability. Shifting focus from external blame to personal strategy can lead to better decisions and outcomes. Education, discipline, and mentorship can significantly tilt the odds in one’s favor—even in difficult environments.

Acknowledging Real Issues

This isn’t to dismiss genuine systemic challenges like discrimination, unequal access to quality education, and economic disparities. These issues are real and demand attention. However, labeling the entire system as unfair oversimplifies the matter and diminishes the importance of personal responsibility in overcoming obstacles.

Master the System

The system is a complex web of rules, opportunities, and challenges. It cannot be universally labeled fair or unfair because fairness is shaped by personal perspective and experience. What matters most is how effectively you learn to navigate it.

Knowledge, persistence, and adaptability often prove far more powerful than debating abstract notions of fairness. The real challenge isn’t in questioning fairness but in empowering yourself and others to master the system on your own terms.

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.

Related Posts

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

Do you have:

  • A bold idea or unique insight?
  • A story of success—or hard-won lessons from failure?
  • Expert advice your peers need to hear?

Join other forward-thinkers shaping the future of philanthropy. Share your perspective, elevate the conversation, and let your voice be heard.

Contribute your wisdom today.

Related Posts

Stone stairway ascending through clouds toward bright sunlight

Mission-Driven Giving at Work: What Faith-Based Campaigns Can Teach the Philanthropy Sector

Faith-based fundraising offers powerful lessons for the broader philanthropy sector. By anchoring giving in mission, community, and shared values, these campaigns inspire deeper donor commitment. Their focus on storytelling, transparency, leadership participation, and consistent engagement creates a culture of generosity. As Millennials and Gen Z prioritize mission-driven giving, nonprofits that adopt these principles can strengthen donor relationships, increase participation, and build more resilient, purpose-driven communities.

Read More »
Calm workspace overlooking an autumn forest through a large window, symbolizing transparency, clarity, and strong nonprofit governance

How Zero-Staff Governance Built a $2M+ Endowment

Small nonprofits don’t need staff or scale to achieve big-institution results. The GOSUMEC Foundation USA built a $2M+ endowment with 95% donor retention and zero campaigns by combining identity-centered community design, disciplined governance, and radical transparency. Its ICCO™ model turns donors into co-owners, while the GIVE cycle converts gratitude and voice into recurring support. Governance—not overhead—became the infrastructure, proving trust is the ultimate operating system for small nonprofits.

Read More »
Close-up of a futuristic artificial intelligence hand glowing with red neural network lights, symbolizing AI power and digital transformation in the nonprofit sector

AI and Nonprofits: Poll Results

Nonprofits aren’t “exploring” AI—they’ve already outsourced half their workload to it, mostly without policies, guardrails, or governance. Our latest sector poll shows AI has crossed from experiment to infrastructure while leadership naps. Staff are using it to survive; organizations pretend it’s optional. This is the wake-up call: AI won’t level the field—it will widen it. The competent will soar, and the careless will get exposed.

Read More »
Colorful brain illustration representing dopamine, oxytocin, and the neuroscience of generosity with neural connections radiating outward.

Neuro-Philanthropy: From Dopamine to Oxytocin

Philanthropy has mastered urgency — the dopamine-fueled rush of campaigns and instant action — but sustainable giving requires something deeper: relationship. Neuroscience shows that while dopamine sparks generosity, oxytocin sustains it by building trust, belonging, and identity. When nonprofits move beyond transactions and cultivate connection, donors shift from one-time givers to long-term partners — and ultimately to legacy supporters. The future of philanthropy lies not in louder appeals, but in nurturing relationships that endure and compound over time.

Read More »
>