Why Grantmakers Are Getting Tougher With Nonprofits

Zoomed in image of currency showing the capitol building in Washington DC
Reading Time: 4 minutes

Nonprofits that fail to plan for the future are in for a rude awakening. Community foundations and other grantmakers—once seen as reliable sources of funding—are becoming increasingly selective about where their money goes. And they’re not interested in propping up organizations that refuse to take sustainability seriously.

Why? Because too many nonprofits have become complacent. They rely on handouts instead of building real financial resilience. The data from the past five years is clear: transactional fundraising alone is not enough to sustain an organization long-term. If you’re only thinking about your next event, your next appeal, or your next grant cycle—rather than how your organization will be thriving a decade from now—why should funders invest in you?

Planned Giving: A Litmus Test for Responsible Nonprofits

Community foundations and major donors are looking for nonprofits that understand one fundamental truth: longevity matters. And one of the best indicators of long-term thinking is whether an organization is serious about planned giving.

A nonprofit that invests in planned giving is demonstrating:

  • A commitment to its future sustainability.
  • A strategic mindset beyond short-term cash grabs.
  • An understanding that true philanthropy is about relationships, not just transactions.

Compare that to the nonprofits that operate like financial black holes—always asking, always struggling, and never evolving. Why would a foundation want to pour money into an organization that isn’t taking steps to ensure its own survival?

Why should I care about your future if you don’t?

Complacency Should Not Be Rewarded

Too many nonprofits have coasted for too long—treating donor support as a right instead of something to earn through strategy, discipline, and a future-focused mindset.

Funders (both government and private) are no longer in the business of bailing out organizations that refuse to mature. If your nonprofit is still stuck in survival mode—lurching from one grant cycle to the next, ignoring long-term strategy—it’s already failed the test.

Maybe it’s the nature of the nonprofit world to attract people who’ve opted out of the real business arena—those more comfortable in a bubble of good intentions than in the marketplace of results.

Planned giving isn’t a side dish anymore. It’s the signal that your nonprofit is built to last. Funders want proof you’re playing the long game—and if you can’t show that, they’re moving on.

Reality Check: Recent Cuts in Federal Funding Are Weeding Out Weak Nonprofits

Love him or hate him, Trump’s administration has taken a sharp knife to government spending, especially in areas where dependency has been the norm. And while some may see this as harsh, there’s a certain economic reality at play: when funding dries up, the weak organizations—the ones that have never prioritized sustainability—will die off.

It’s like a hurricane hitting the shoreline—when the storm clears, the old, fragile structures are wiped away, making room for new, stronger foundations that can withstand the next disaster. The nonprofits that crumble were never built to last. But those that reinforce their structures—by investing in sustainability, planning ahead, and adapting—will emerge even stronger.

It’s a classic case of “survival of the fittest.” Pro-business governments tend to operate this way because history shows that strong organizations (whether in business or in the nonprofit world) will adapt, innovate, and get stronger. Those that don’t? They were never built for longevity in the first place.

If your nonprofit’s entire existence depends on government grants and emergency funding, the message is clear: you’re at risk and should be worried. The organizations that will survive (and thrive) are the ones that take a proactive approach. They are diversifying their funding sources. They are building endowments. They are investing in planned giving.

Nothing New—Donor Money Has Been Drying Up for Years

Jonathan Gudema at MajorGifts.com has been warning about this for years, and the numbers prove it. The problem isn’t just with community foundations—it’s across the board.

  • Over the past four years, individual giving has declined by $65 billion, according to recent data.
  • Wealthy donors are becoming more strategic and discerning about where their money goes.
  • Funders aren’t just looking for passion; they want proof of sustainability and a clear vision for the future.

The free money era is over. Nonprofits that refuse to adapt will die. There are no more free rides—it’s survival of the smartest now. If your entire fundraising strategy depends on handouts and short-term appeals, you’re already on borrowed time. It’s time to stop begging and start planning.

The free money era is over. Survival of the smartest starts now.

Nonprofits Created Their Own Storm—Now They’re Crying That It’s Raining

Let’s be clear: the situation many nonprofits find themselves in today isn’t some unforeseen tragedy. It’s the direct result of years of short-term thinking, poor financial planning, and an overreliance on easy money.

For decades, many organizations have operated as if the funding faucet would never run dry—chasing grants, relying on government handouts, and treating donors like ATM machines rather than long-term partners. Instead of building reserves, endowments, or planned giving programs, they doubled down on the same broken model.

Now that the tide is turning and foundations are demanding sustainability, these same nonprofits are crying foul. But they shouldn’t be surprised. They created their own storm. Now they’re upset that it’s raining.

The nonprofit sector isn’t much different from the failures of our welfare system. For decades, we’ve seen that simply handing people money without requiring self-sufficiency doesn’t improve their situation—it just creates permanent dependency. The same goes for nonprofits. When organizations rely too heavily on grants and government support, they don’t build the skills, strategy, or financial foundation needed to survive on their own. Helping those who refuse to help themselves has never worked—and it never will.

The truth? The nonprofits that suffer the most in times of economic tightening are the ones that refused to prepare. And that’s nobody’s fault but their own.

Helping those who refuse to help themselves has never worked—and it never will.

Funders Want to Support Survivors, Not Dependents

Community foundations and Grantmakers aren’t charities for charities. They are strategic investors in the nonprofit sector. And like any good investor, they want to back organizations with a clear future.

If your nonprofit is only interested in the next grant cycle, rather than the next generation, you are signaling to funders that you don’t have a plan. And if you don’t have a plan, you don’t deserve their money.

And if you still plan to rely on grants, you better work with a grant writer who is the best of the best. You will need her. Because competition for funding is tighter than ever, and foundations are no longer handing out money to just anyone with a mission statement.

Planned giving isn’t optional anymore. It’s the price of admission for serious, sustainable nonprofits.

Planned giving is no longer optional. It’s the non-negotiable price of admission for a sustainable future.

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.

One Comment

  • I’m grateful for your commonsense thinking on this subject. I have received numerous emails from other fundraising professionals and organizations lamenting the actions being taken by President Trump and DOGE. I am concerned about the way my tax dollars are being used by organizations that don’t hold themselves accountable for growing their donor base and instead rely heavily on government funding.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices!

Do you have:

  • A unique insight or bold idea?
  • A story of success—or valuable lessons from failure?
  • Expert advice that could guide your peers?

Join other forward-thinkers in shaping the future of philanthropy. Contribute today and let your voice be heard.

Related Posts

Two people pointing at the same number from opposite sides—one sees 66, the other sees 99—illustrating how perspective shapes perception.

Living on the Right Side of the Street

As we drive through our neighborhoods, each home tells a different story. On one side, mornings begin with breakfasts, school runs, and fresh energy. On the other, night-shift workers are winding down, reflecting on the day’s lessons. Our perspective defines what we see—hope or fatigue, beginnings or conclusions. By asking, “What does this look like from the other side of the street?” we open the door to empathy. In families, communities, and work, this simple shift can build deeper understanding, turning judgment into connection and isolation into belonging.

Read More »
Finger poised over a glowing red panic button—symbolizing the urgent, high-stakes decisions nonprofits face in uncertain times.

Have We Been Here Before?

Laura MacDonald discusses how nonprofits face recurring disruptions but historically remain resilient. Despite challenges like COVID-19, tax changes, recessions, and current political anxiety, charitable giving has averaged 6% growth since 1967. She advises organizations to project resilience, sustain relationships, respond strategically rather than react, and adopt donor-centric approaches. Rather than making preemptive decisions for donors, nonprofits should stay the course and continue their missions, as anxiety is the enemy of philanthropy but donor confidence typically rebounds within 6-18 months after disruptions.

Read More »
People collaboratively nurturing and tending a flourishing garden, symbolizing humble stewardship through caring cultivation rather than control

Stewardship: More Than You Realized

The author argues that true stewardship requires humility and self-awareness, not just good management skills. Many stewardship efforts remain transactional rather than transformational due to lack of humility. The solution involves self-stewardship through 15 attributes of humility, including being teachable, correctable, and focused on helping others succeed. A donor-centric approach requires genuine curiosity about donors’ passions and motivations. Effective stewardship involves asking better questions, deep listening, and building meaningful relationships. Ultimately, stewardship isn’t about money or control—it’s about love and compassionate service to others.

Read More »
Person standing on endless Möbius strip representing the complex mystery and paradoxical relationship between donor intentions and bequest behavior

The Mystery Behind Bequest Non-Disclosures: A 5-Part Mini-Series

After five decades in nonprofit development, the author explores why donors openly discuss outright gifts but become secretive about planned giving. Key barriers include fear of mortality, financial insecurity, complexity, trust issues, family dynamics, and concerns about increased solicitation pressure. The $84.4 trillion wealth transfer opportunity is significant, yet fewer than 25% of donors with charitable estate plans notify organizations. Success requires building trust, simplifying processes, emphasizing confidentiality, creating legacy donor communities, and prioritizing family needs first before introducing charitable considerations.

Read More »