No Kids? Adopt a Cause.

An image of an older woman holding a Yorkie dog on shoulder, to illustrate the concept that childless donors represent a rapidly growing portion of the population — and that presents a valuable opportunity for nonprofits..
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Have you ever wondered how people without children choose to leave their legacy? @TamarJune, CEO of @AssurX, recently shared a thought-provoking article from The Wall Street Journal titled  “People Without Kids Are Leaving Money to Surprised Heirs.”

The article highlights an interesting trend: charities, distant relatives, and even pets are becoming the beneficiaries of surprise inheritances. For those of us in the nonprofit sector, this is a wake-up call—a significant opportunity to engage with a growing demographic that’s thinking beyond traditional family boundaries.

Childless Donors Give More

It’s no secret, but the number of childless donors is staggering. We’ve long known that people without children tend to leave more to charity, so that wasn’t a surprise. In fact, a Yale study—cited in the same WSJ article—found that people without children or grandchildren tend to gift triple the amount to charity than those with direct descendants.

The real eye-opener for us was that there’s been a significant uptick in the number of folks who are choosing not to have children.  

The WSJ references a Pew Research Center study that found “57% of adults under 50 who say they’re unlikely to ever have kids say a major reason is they just don’t want to; 31% of those ages 50 and older without kids cite this as a reason they never had them.”

The study also found that the number of those under 50 who will likely remain childless rose 10 percentage points, to 47 percent.

Good News for Nonprofits

Now couple that information with a Chronicle of Philanthropy study, which found that over 8.2 million Americans who do not have children have assets in excess of $1M.

That’s a lot of opportunity for savvy nonprofits. And if the studies are correct, there are going to be a lot more childless people in the not-so-distant future—which means even more opportunity (and surprise inheritances) on the horizon.

So What Can You Do?

It’s easy:

1 | Know Your Audience

First and foremost, ensure you have good data, which will allow you to identify and segment prospects by demographics—including whether or not they have children.

2 | Market Planned Gifts Effectively

Then get busy marketing planned gifts to them. Send out postcards. Follow up with a digital campaign. Find creative new ways to reach and appeal to this segment of your audience. For instance, one nonprofit mentioned in the WSJ article created an “heirless donors” section on their website, and uses the idea of building a legacy to entice supporters.

3 | Promote Will Creation

Be sure to also encourage your supporters to create a will, and incorporate will making software into your website. Over 92% of planned gifts are bequests, after all.

4 | Start Now

And most importantly, get started NOW. Like starting a planned giving program, the best time to steward your childless donors was 10 years ago. The second-best time is now.

The Opportunity

As societal norms continue to evolve, so do donor demographics. For nonprofits, this represents an incredible opportunity to invite childless donors into your own “family.” By tailoring your outreach and connecting with this growing audience, you can build lasting relationships that translate into meaningful gifts for your organization’s future.

The future of philanthropy is shifting. Are you embracing it?

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.

Related Posts

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

Do you have:

  • A bold idea or unique insight?
  • A story of success—or hard-won lessons from failure?
  • Expert advice your peers need to hear?

Join other forward-thinkers shaping the future of philanthropy. Share your perspective, elevate the conversation, and let your voice be heard.

Contribute your wisdom today.

Related Posts

Surreal desert landscape shaped like a human eye, symbolizing the illusion behind inflated legacy gift lists and the need for clearer vision

The $117 Million Mirage: Why Most Legacy Gift Lists Are Illusions

A nonprofit celebrated 1,270 bequest commitments worth $117 million. Reality check: filtering for actual prospects yielded 55 names. Calling those 55? They reached five people—none remembered making any commitment. The culprit: organizations spending $8,000-$20,000 annually on digital tools, expecting software to cultivate donor relationships. When results disappoint, staff move on, leaving nonprofits with the cleanup. The lesson: five genuine legacy phone calls will always outperform 1,270 fictional commitments. You can’t build relationships with shiny website objects.

Read More »
Depiction of Harvard University

Would You Donate to Harvard?

Harvard: citadel of brilliance or fortress of privilege? For decades, liberals slammed it as an elitist gatekeeper—legacy admissions, donor perks, and wealth dressed up as meritocracy. Now, conservatives aim to gut its funding, branding it a woke factory. Different flags, same battlefield. Reform or revenge—the motives have shifted, but Harvard remains rich, elite, and untouchable. The question isn’t whether it deserves criticism. It’s whether you’d bankroll an empire of inherited advantage… or gamble on the promise of change.

Read More »
Nonprofit board members sitting in a conference room - watercolor rendering

Nonprofit Boards Should Include Young People

It’s time we stop thinking of young people as future leaders and start recognizing them as current ones. Boards are not clubs for years served but strategic bodies for stewarding the mission. Readiness isn’t about age—it’s about perspective, commitment, and passion. Including younger voices isn’t symbolic—it’s strategic. They bring energy, authenticity, and digital fluency. If your board makes decisions about youth, equity, or tech, their presence isn’t optional—it’s essential. Empower them, don’t just appoint them.

Read More »
>