Donors Want a Story to Remember, Not a Fact to Memorize

Cameraman preparing a video recording for a story
Reading Time: < 1 minute

You don’t need more data in your fundraising.

Instead, go get:

Why?

In an aid-effectiveness study — published in the European Journal of Development Research — thousands of German donors said nonprofit testimonials — stories — resonate more than data.

And 56% of social media users who donate online said compelling storytelling makes them give most, according to Nonprofit Tech for Good. Stories were the number one motivation, while data wasn’t on the list.

Don’t get me wrong.

Investing in measurement is simply the right thing to do for impact accountability. So narrative + numbers is the ultimate fundraising combo. 

But “people forget facts; they never forget a good story,” says fundraising expert Claire Axelrad, J.D., CFRE.

Numbers tell. Stories sell.

And good storytelling is the probably the most powerful tool your nonprofit can utilize. 

The Daily Bonus

Donors initially give based on emotional signals — like your brand, storytelling, and communication skills — but then justify that gift with logic.

(Even if they don’t admit it.)

In fact, Harvard Business Review says 95% of our purchase decisions occur unconsciously. And their research found that our conscious mind will later make up reasons to validate our unconscious choices.

“Advances in neuroscience have helped us to understand that the brain processes meaning before detail,” says fundraising firm For Impact.

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.
    • Do you feel unseen, unheard, and underfunded? To get funding, you need to be fundable & findable. It’s your brand — not fundraising alone — that attracts the money. So stop chasing donations and build your brand first, funding second.

      View all posts

    Related Posts

    Colored open hand illustration

    Seeking Visionary Voices

    Do you have:

    • A bold idea or unique insight?
    • A story of success—or hard-won lessons from failure?
    • Expert advice your peers need to hear?

    Join other forward-thinkers shaping the future of philanthropy. Share your perspective, elevate the conversation, and let your voice be heard.

    Contribute your wisdom today.

    Related Posts

    Wall Street Journal Clipping: Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think

    Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think — And Donors Are Catching On

    In 2017, the Wall Street Journal warned: “Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think.” Eight years later, was it prophecy? Alumni giving is down. Public confidence has collapsed. Colleges are closing almost weekly. Donors now ask: Am I funding thinkers—or just diplomas? Real education, or expensive amenities? If students leave no better at reasoning than when they arrived, why should anyone keep writing checks? The warning was clear. The collapse was inevitable.

    Read More »
    Surreal desert landscape shaped like a human eye, symbolizing the illusion behind inflated legacy gift lists and the need for clearer vision

    The $117 Million Mirage: Why Most Legacy Gift Lists Are Illusions

    A nonprofit celebrated 1,270 bequest commitments worth $117 million. Reality check: filtering for actual prospects yielded 55 names. Calling those 55? They reached five people—none remembered making any commitment. The culprit: organizations spending $8,000-$20,000 annually on digital tools, expecting software to cultivate donor relationships. When results disappoint, staff move on, leaving nonprofits with the cleanup. The lesson: five genuine legacy phone calls will always outperform 1,270 fictional commitments. You can’t build relationships with shiny website objects.

    Read More »
    Depiction of Harvard University

    Would You Donate to Harvard?

    Harvard: citadel of brilliance or fortress of privilege? For decades, liberals slammed it as an elitist gatekeeper—legacy admissions, donor perks, and wealth dressed up as meritocracy. Now, conservatives aim to gut its funding, branding it a woke factory. Different flags, same battlefield. Reform or revenge—the motives have shifted, but Harvard remains rich, elite, and untouchable. The question isn’t whether it deserves criticism. It’s whether you’d bankroll an empire of inherited advantage… or gamble on the promise of change.

    Read More »
    >