Chase Magnuson

A nonprofit celebrated 1,270 bequest commitments worth $117 million. Reality check: filtering for actual prospects yielded 55 names. Calling those 55? They reached five people—none remembered making any commitment. The culprit: organizations spending $8,000-$20,000 annually on digital tools, expecting software to cultivate donor relationships. When results disappoint, staff move on, leaving nonprofits with the cleanup. The lesson: five genuine legacy phone calls will always outperform 1,270 fictional commitments. You can't build relationships with shiny website objects.

Harvard: citadel of brilliance or fortress of privilege? For decades, liberals slammed it as an elitist gatekeeper—legacy admissions, donor perks, and wealth dressed up as meritocracy. Now, conservatives aim to gut its funding, branding it a woke factory. Different flags, same battlefield. Reform or revenge—the motives have shifted, but Harvard remains rich, elite, and untouchable. The question isn’t whether it deserves criticism. It’s whether you’d bankroll an empire of inherited advantage… or gamble on the promise of change.

On July 4th, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB) became law—prompting predictable panic in the nonprofit sector. Critics decried lower top-tier deductions and a new AGI floor. But pause. OBBB didn’t undercut charitable giving—it strengthened it. By making key reforms permanent, it created clarity: a 60% AGI limit for cash gifts, a new deduction for non-itemizers, and preserved estate exemptions. Just as important, it solidified long-term economic stability—an essential foundation for future generosity. This wasn’t a loss; it was a safeguard. The smart fundraiser sees the opportunity, not the noise. It’s time to stop reacting—and start leading.

Featured Cover Preview Operation Contagious Philanthropy: Finding That Eureka! Narrative to Engage Navy SEALs Kim Rhinehelder, CFRE, National Director of Development & …