The System Is Not Unfair

A single, frowning pawn stepping out of the crowd, to symbolize the perception that the system is unfair.

In Brief

Fairness is subjective, often rooted in financial literacy gaps, not systemic bias. The system rewards those who understand its rules and take personal responsibility, while ignorance fuels the illusion of unfairness. Genuine inequalities exist but don’t define the entire system. This nation offers many free resources—take advantage of them. Blaming the system disempowers; mastering knowledge, strategy, and effort empowers. Success favors those who learn, adapt, and take control.
Reading Time: 2 minutes

What’s Fair for One May Not Be Fair for Another

Fairness is subjective. A 2021 study revealed that 70% of people earning under $50,000 a year felt the tax system was unfair, while only 30% of those earning above $100,000 shared the same view. What seems unfair to one person might appear entirely just to another.

Take taxation, for example. Many argue, “the rich should be taxed more,” but what defines being rich? Earning $100,000 a year? $1 million? Six years ago, while presenting to a local AFP (Association of Fundraising Professionals) chapter in Northeastern Pennsylvania, I asked, “What does the top 1% earn?” Responses ranged from $150,000 to $50 million a year. This wide gap highlights how financial literacy varies greatly. Without a clear understanding of income levels, judging wealth, fairness, or opportunity becomes challenging.

This knowledge gap is especially important for fundraisers, who operate directly in the financial realm. Accurate understanding is crucial for success in both personal and professional finance.

Knowledge is Power

Many elements of the system are neutral but require knowledge to leverage effectively. Financial literacy, legal awareness, and strategic networking often determine success more than systemic bias.

Consider the tax code. It can feel complex and punishing—but those who take the time to understand its intricacies often discover legal ways to minimize their tax burden. The system tends to reward those who learn its rules rather than those who dismiss it as unfair.

A simple question: Do you know how to read a basic profit and loss statement? Do you even know what that means? As a fundraiser, you’re in the “money business.” Mastering financial basics gives you a powerful advantage.

Take Personal Responsibility

The narrative of systemic unfairness often overlooks how life circumstances are highly individualized. Two people from similar backgrounds can experience vastly different outcomes based on their personal choices, effort, and knowledge.

One individual might access scholarships, mentorship, or career opportunities because they learned how to seek them out, while another might remain unaware of the same options. Does that make the system unfair—or does it reflect differing levels of understanding and action?

Empowerment Through Perspective

Viewing the system as inherently unfair can be disempowering, fostering a mindset of victimhood rather than agency and accountability. Shifting focus from external blame to personal strategy can lead to better decisions and outcomes. Education, discipline, and mentorship can significantly tilt the odds in one’s favor—even in difficult environments.

Acknowledging Real Issues

This isn’t to dismiss genuine systemic challenges like discrimination, unequal access to quality education, and economic disparities. These issues are real and demand attention. However, labeling the entire system as unfair oversimplifies the matter and diminishes the importance of personal responsibility in overcoming obstacles.

Master the System

The system is a complex web of rules, opportunities, and challenges. It cannot be universally labeled fair or unfair because fairness is shaped by personal perspective and experience. What matters most is how effectively you learn to navigate it.

Knowledge, persistence, and adaptability often prove far more powerful than debating abstract notions of fairness. The real challenge isn’t in questioning fairness but in empowering yourself and others to master the system on your own terms.

What stood out to you? Join the conversation below.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Viken Mikaelian founded PlannedGiving.com in 1998 and has spent nearly three decades advising and training nonprofit professionals responsible for billions in charitable gifts. He has presented at over 500 fundraising conferences and is widely published on planned giving strategy. Viken is the founder of philanthropy.org and publisher of GIVING Magazine.

    View all posts

Browse by Topic

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

We occasionally publish thoughtful perspectives from practitioners and researchers shaping the future of philanthropy.

Learn about contributing.

Related Posts

A golden egg, representing the planned gift, sits in front of a hen in a sunlit barn. It's a visual take on the chicken-and-egg question of whether planned gifts or major gifts should come first.

Major Gifts vs. Planned Gifts

Donors are reading your Form 990, and most of them never call. What they want to know is whether your nonprofit is planning for the next 50 years. Major gifts matter, but planned giving belongs at the start of your fundraising strategy because it shows you are planning for the future. Here’s why wealthy donors, foundations and government funders all judge you the same way, and how to show them your future.

Read More »

Stop Cleaning Your Email List of “Unengaged” Subscribers

Whether you’re a community foundation sharing grant outcomes, a nonprofit reporting program results, or a university connecting scholarship donors to students, the moment your donor hears from or about the person their money reached is rarely given the strategic attention it deserves.

Read More »
>