The System Is Not Unfair

A single, frowning pawn stepping out of the crowd, to symbolize the perception that the system is unfair.
Reading Time: 2 minutes

What’s Fair for One May Not Be Fair for Another

Fairness is subjective. A 2021 study revealed that 70% of people earning under $50,000 a year felt the tax system was unfair, while only 30% of those earning above $100,000 shared the same view. What seems unfair to one person might appear entirely just to another.

Take taxation, for example. Many argue, “the rich should be taxed more,” but what defines being rich? Earning $100,000 a year? $1 million? Six years ago, while presenting to a local AFP (Association of Fundraising Professionals) chapter in Northeastern Pennsylvania, I asked, “What does the top 1% earn?” Responses ranged from $150,000 to $50 million a year. This wide gap highlights how financial literacy varies greatly. Without a clear understanding of income levels, judging wealth, fairness, or opportunity becomes challenging.

This knowledge gap is especially important for fundraisers, who operate directly in the financial realm. Accurate understanding is crucial for success in both personal and professional finance.

Knowledge is Power

Many elements of the system are neutral but require knowledge to leverage effectively. Financial literacy, legal awareness, and strategic networking often determine success more than systemic bias.

Consider the tax code. It can feel complex and punishing—but those who take the time to understand its intricacies often discover legal ways to minimize their tax burden. The system tends to reward those who learn its rules rather than those who dismiss it as unfair.

A simple question: Do you know how to read a basic profit and loss statement? Do you even know what that means? As a fundraiser, you’re in the “money business.” Mastering financial basics gives you a powerful advantage.

Take Personal Responsibility

The narrative of systemic unfairness often overlooks how life circumstances are highly individualized. Two people from similar backgrounds can experience vastly different outcomes based on their personal choices, effort, and knowledge.

One individual might access scholarships, mentorship, or career opportunities because they learned how to seek them out, while another might remain unaware of the same options. Does that make the system unfair—or does it reflect differing levels of understanding and action?

Empowerment Through Perspective

Viewing the system as inherently unfair can be disempowering, fostering a mindset of victimhood rather than agency and accountability. Shifting focus from external blame to personal strategy can lead to better decisions and outcomes. Education, discipline, and mentorship can significantly tilt the odds in one’s favor—even in difficult environments.

Acknowledging Real Issues

This isn’t to dismiss genuine systemic challenges like discrimination, unequal access to quality education, and economic disparities. These issues are real and demand attention. However, labeling the entire system as unfair oversimplifies the matter and diminishes the importance of personal responsibility in overcoming obstacles.

Master the System

The system is a complex web of rules, opportunities, and challenges. It cannot be universally labeled fair or unfair because fairness is shaped by personal perspective and experience. What matters most is how effectively you learn to navigate it.

Knowledge, persistence, and adaptability often prove far more powerful than debating abstract notions of fairness. The real challenge isn’t in questioning fairness but in empowering yourself and others to master the system on your own terms.

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.

Related Posts

Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices

Do you have:

  • A bold idea or unique insight?
  • A story of success—or hard-won lessons from failure?
  • Expert advice your peers need to hear?

Join other forward-thinkers shaping the future of philanthropy. Share your perspective, elevate the conversation, and let your voice be heard.

Contribute your wisdom today.

Related Posts

Wall Street Journal Clipping: Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think

Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think — And Donors Are Catching On

In 2017, the Wall Street Journal warned: “Many Colleges Fail in Teaching How to Think.” Eight years later, was it prophecy? Alumni giving is down. Public confidence has collapsed. Colleges are closing almost weekly. Donors now ask: Am I funding thinkers—or just diplomas? Real education, or expensive amenities? If students leave no better at reasoning than when they arrived, why should anyone keep writing checks? The warning was clear. The collapse was inevitable.

Read More »
Surreal desert landscape shaped like a human eye, symbolizing the illusion behind inflated legacy gift lists and the need for clearer vision

The $117 Million Mirage: Why Most Legacy Gift Lists Are Illusions

A nonprofit celebrated 1,270 bequest commitments worth $117 million. Reality check: filtering for actual prospects yielded 55 names. Calling those 55? They reached five people—none remembered making any commitment. The culprit: organizations spending $8,000-$20,000 annually on digital tools, expecting software to cultivate donor relationships. When results disappoint, staff move on, leaving nonprofits with the cleanup. The lesson: five genuine legacy phone calls will always outperform 1,270 fictional commitments. You can’t build relationships with shiny website objects.

Read More »
Depiction of Harvard University

Would You Donate to Harvard?

Harvard: citadel of brilliance or fortress of privilege? For decades, liberals slammed it as an elitist gatekeeper—legacy admissions, donor perks, and wealth dressed up as meritocracy. Now, conservatives aim to gut its funding, branding it a woke factory. Different flags, same battlefield. Reform or revenge—the motives have shifted, but Harvard remains rich, elite, and untouchable. The question isn’t whether it deserves criticism. It’s whether you’d bankroll an empire of inherited advantage… or gamble on the promise of change.

Read More »
>