The Telling and Troubling Way We Continue to Teach Fundraising

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Consider all the fundraising texts, blogs, articles, podcasts and conferences. Evaluate the content and note how often and carefully they parse and re-parse the process of fundraising, providing tips, tactics and tools for:

  • Identifying prospects
  • Acquiring donors
  • Engaging prospects
  • Making more compelling appeals
  • Soliciting prospects
  • Stewarding donors

Note how often the tone of these instructive materials treats fundraising as something we do to prospective givers, not what we do with potential partners.

Note how often the tone of these instructive materials treats fundraising as something we do to prospective givers, not what we do with potential partners. See how often they tout the latest technology with acknowledging that donor attrition has accelerated even as more and more sophisticated technology has become available to us.

In Pursuit of Metrics

Observe how frequently are we told what metrics will produce the best annual yields and how infrequently are we instructed on:

    • The ways to optimize the lifelong potential of each donor we are lucky enough to have

    • How rapid and impersonal transactional fundraising inevitably leads to higher rates of donor attrition and, therefore, long-term fundraising potential

    • How to listen for, respect and align our interests with donors’ most deeply held values

    • How to build not just “predictive profiles” but gather relevant donor information that will allow us to more gracefully manage long-term relationships even in the face of the constant turnover of fundraisers

    • The most effective ways of building and deepening donor loyalty

    • How building loyalty leads to higher levels of giving over time and the more regular receipt of significant estate gifts

    • How to pulse donors to ask how satisfied they are with their giving experience and what we can learn from other organizations that have, in their estimation, done a better job than us

    • How to create donor experiences that money can’t buy

    • How to turn donor talents into greater commitments of time and, eventually, treasure

In Pursuit of Credibility

Observe how rarely they underscore what organizations must obligate themselves to if they are to strengthen their fundraising credibility and appeal, including:

    • Conducting needs assessments to show how they are responding to changing societal needs

    • Being clear about where specific amounts of private support will lead to greater service delivery

    • Establishing performance metrics for mission delivery, not just fundraising

    • Making stewardship and accountability a shared institutional ethic

    • Developing policies, procedures and practices to ensure donor intent is preserved even long after the donor is gone

    • Treating donors like shareholders by giving them opportunities to voice their hopes and concerns and to be an integral part of organizational planning

Sustained Success

Note how infrequently they touch on, much less delve into, the predicates of sustained fundraising success including:

    • The architecture and process, including step-by-step strategies and tactics, for building communities of shared purpose that allow donors to believe, belong and make the world better

    • Appealing to the cause orientation of younger generations

    • Creating “big tent” coalitions in which diverse populations can find common cause

    • Creating constituents and developing partnerships in ways that are not unduly fundraising-forward

  • Creating civic collaborations and community-based coalitions that demonstrate how purpose-driven organizations are working together to address the root causes of social ills or steadily widen the circle of opportunity
Sign that reads "time for change."

Time for a Change

These predicates are what too many fundraising organizations are oblivious of or have taken for granted for too long, which has contributed to the decline in philanthropic participation, more rapid rates of donor attrition, and the steady decline in the effectiveness of fundraising-forward approaches. That, in turn, has led to the tendency of unaware bosses and board members to fault fundraisers and double down on traditional tactics, ignoring the laws of diminishing returns. As a consequence, fundraisers’ effectiveness is sorely sub-optimized, leaving them discouraged and looking elsewhere.

The predicates are what most fundraising organizations need to turn to with urgency and imagination if they are to stem the longstanding and apparently unrelenting trend of “donors up, dollars down,” the greater reliance on the wealthy, aged few, and avoid the inevitable, steady “dollars down” that will come as the wealthy few pass on.

We value your insights! What stood out to you in this article? Join or start a conversation below.

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Jim is the President of Langley Innovations and a leading expert in philanthropy and higher education advancement. With over 30 years of experience, he has led transformative campaigns, authored five books, and advised over 130 institutions. Known for innovative strategies and donor-centric approaches, his work has raised billions and reshaped fundraising practices.

    View all posts
Colored open hand illustration

Seeking Visionary Voices!

Do you have:

  • A unique insight or bold idea?
  • A story of success—or valuable lessons from failure?
  • Expert advice that could guide your peers?

Join other forward-thinkers in shaping the future of philanthropy. Contribute today and let your voice be heard.

Related Posts

Two people pointing at the same number from opposite sides—one sees 66, the other sees 99—illustrating how perspective shapes perception.

Living on the Right Side of the Street

As we drive through our neighborhoods, each home tells a different story. On one side, mornings begin with breakfasts, school runs, and fresh energy. On the other, night-shift workers are winding down, reflecting on the day’s lessons. Our perspective defines what we see—hope or fatigue, beginnings or conclusions. By asking, “What does this look like from the other side of the street?” we open the door to empathy. In families, communities, and work, this simple shift can build deeper understanding, turning judgment into connection and isolation into belonging.

Read More »
Finger poised over a glowing red panic button—symbolizing the urgent, high-stakes decisions nonprofits face in uncertain times.

Have We Been Here Before?

Laura MacDonald discusses how nonprofits face recurring disruptions but historically remain resilient. Despite challenges like COVID-19, tax changes, recessions, and current political anxiety, charitable giving has averaged 6% growth since 1967. She advises organizations to project resilience, sustain relationships, respond strategically rather than react, and adopt donor-centric approaches. Rather than making preemptive decisions for donors, nonprofits should stay the course and continue their missions, as anxiety is the enemy of philanthropy but donor confidence typically rebounds within 6-18 months after disruptions.

Read More »
People collaboratively nurturing and tending a flourishing garden, symbolizing humble stewardship through caring cultivation rather than control

Stewardship: More Than You Realized

The author argues that true stewardship requires humility and self-awareness, not just good management skills. Many stewardship efforts remain transactional rather than transformational due to lack of humility. The solution involves self-stewardship through 15 attributes of humility, including being teachable, correctable, and focused on helping others succeed. A donor-centric approach requires genuine curiosity about donors’ passions and motivations. Effective stewardship involves asking better questions, deep listening, and building meaningful relationships. Ultimately, stewardship isn’t about money or control—it’s about love and compassionate service to others.

Read More »
Person standing on endless Möbius strip representing the complex mystery and paradoxical relationship between donor intentions and bequest behavior

The Mystery Behind Bequest Non-Disclosures: A 5-Part Mini-Series

After five decades in nonprofit development, the author explores why donors openly discuss outright gifts but become secretive about planned giving. Key barriers include fear of mortality, financial insecurity, complexity, trust issues, family dynamics, and concerns about increased solicitation pressure. The $84.4 trillion wealth transfer opportunity is significant, yet fewer than 25% of donors with charitable estate plans notify organizations. Success requires building trust, simplifying processes, emphasizing confidentiality, creating legacy donor communities, and prioritizing family needs first before introducing charitable considerations.

Read More »